Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (106247)	7/18/2003 6:10:33 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

What is this baloney? "IRREFUTABLE that Saddam provided support and sanctuary to Abu Nidal and Abu Abbas, both of whom are responsible for the loss of US lives." You doubt this? Where were both of those individuals and their numerous "staff" and operatives living over the past 10 years?? Could it be Baghdad?.. Yes. And could anyone of such notoriety find sanctuary in Iraq without the EXPRESS KNOWLEDGE AND APPROVAL of Saddam and his regime?? No. Because that, GST, is NOT how totalitarian regimes work. No one in the Baathist government would have made such a decisions on their own authority, risking the consequences of displeasing or embarrassing Saddam. Care to respond to anything else I have to say? If so, why not "grace" us with some of your own keen insight. Hawk