Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (1686)	7/18/2003 10:57:52 PM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3143

You repeatedly mis-quote, quote out of context, and put words into others mouths. I said what I said. Not what you said I said. WAP! WAP! WAP! WAP! WAP! (Count beating a dead horse...) That's at least 3 times that you have mis-quoted me, after I have corrected you. I never equated crimes of violence with those who are either uninformed or not as intelligent as myself or others. I said that I have no sympathy for people who repeatedly walk into a situation that is harmful to them. You'd think at some point they would just stop. Did I say that they deserved it? No, I did not - you are putting words into my mouth that I did not say. Did I say that I excuse crimes against them? No, I did not - again, you are putting words into my mouth that I did not say. In fact, I explicitly stated that those crimes deserve to be punished. I said, simply, that I have no sympathy for such victims. As analogy, I offered that I have no sympathy for the drug buyer, buyer of stolen goods, procurer... who repeatedly goes to the bad part of town to engage in those activities, and then gets beat-up. Wah, wah, wha! Their crying is going to fall on deaf ears here. (FWIW, to make a fine distinction, I do have sympathy for the drug ADDICT - I realize that it's a thing that - once addicted, the addict has little control over - and that there are too few effective and accessible treatment and rehabilitation options available in this country.) I don't see the defendants trying to destroy your credibility or engaging in character assasination. In fact, I don't see them saying anything - as it should be. Maybe you should take a clue from them. You can speculate all day that I am acting on behalf of the defendants. But you are wrong - I am not. I am simply reacting to the rediculousness of what you have written here - as I expect a judge and jury to react. I do see you destroying your OWN credibility.