SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (22751)7/19/2003 11:08:13 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
NEWS: U.S. May Be Forced to Go Back to U.N. for Iraq Mandate
[ed: LMAO at the criminal stupidity of the Bush neoCONs... and as they say... what goes around comes around... take another 6% off from Bush from the next poll by these news... the Bush house of cards continues to fall apart... like father like son... only worse...]

Message 19126380

By CHRISTOPHER MARQUIS

WASHINGTON, July 18 — The Bush administration, which spurned the United Nations in its drive to depose Saddam Hussein in Iraq, is finding itself forced back into the arms of the international body because other nations are refusing to contribute peacekeeping troops or reconstruction money without United Nations approval.

With the costs of stabilizing Iraq hovering at $4 billion a month and with American troops being killed at a steady rate, administration officials acknowledge that they are rethinking their strategy and may seek a United Nations resolution for help that would placate other nations, like India, France and Germany.

Administration officials contend that they are being practical, but within their ranks are policy makers sharply critical of the United Nations and those who would consider it humiliating to seek its mantle after risking American lives in the invasion that ousted Mr. Hussein.

The administration's quandary deepened today, when Russia announced that it would consider sending peacekeeping troops but only with a United Nations mandate that set out a specific mission and timetable.

.......click link above for more



To: stockman_scott who wrote (22751)7/20/2003 9:48:15 AM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Among the Democratic presidential hopefuls, Florida Senator Bob Graham is the ONLY one who voted AGAINST the Congressional resolution authorizing Bush to attack Iraq. Several Bush "critics" voted for this Tonkin Gulf style resolution. These hypocrites are even more revolting than Bush