Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (19430)	7/19/2003 5:12:17 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Respond to of 21614

<it is possible that some of the US channels were jammed I doubt it very much that it is to prevent the ship from communicating with other US ships > So why was it done?? At least it is easy to jam reception, and as the attackers were unmarked, that took care of the transmission for some short time. Once again, back in the 60s. --- To another funny thing from 1975, why was that flight MA240 asked to take another turn before landing in Beirut, from Budapest?? Noting that it got shot down on that second time, very close to landing, some 60 died, a couple of (finnish) UN officers, etc.. Those turks also want to finally get some official stuff on that little incident of international terror, some actually came over not so long ago. Why was is that too classified as dodgy, trigger happy intelligence?? -- As well as that old story of Bernadotte, after he returned after having taken a trip in Gaza. Did it really say "duck and cover" in hebrew on that car which made them stop, kind of for the Israeli UN-driver?? -- and why did the Israeli army, just a year ago, break down the walls to that scandinavian sponsored healthclinic, although the door was open. Why did they leave those nasty notes after having carried away all the computers and archives?? -- What about that destruction of that airport, is that sorted out already?? Tough terrorism... clearly a problem.