SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (3526)7/20/2003 12:38:06 AM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
Wesley Pruden

URL:http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/pruden.html

Ready or not, here come Bill and Hillary

newsandopinion.com | The seven Democratic dwarfs (nine if you count Carol Moseley-Braun and Dennis Kucinich) are finally making a racket, but it's muted sound and semi-fury, answering the question that has puzzled the savants for centuries, whether a tree falling in a forest makes a noise if nobody's there to hear it. (It turns out that it doesn't.)

Howard Dean's 15 minutes of pop celebrity is just about up, John Kerry's still trying to get the ketchup stains off his tie, Joe Lieberman can't remember whether he's supposed to be a shark or a chicken, John Edwards has lost sight of the ambulance, Bob Graham can't decide whether to write about the bacon or the eggs he had for breakfast, Al Sharpton has lost his rhyming dictionary, and nobody has seen Dick Gephardt since St. Louis quit making shoes.

But it doesn't matter. The real action begins early next year, when Bill and Hillary ride at last to the rescue, but only of their own fortunes. The signs, identical to the signs pointing to Bill's candidacy at this point in 1991, are clear to anyone who looks very hard.



Hillary's ghostwriters produced her memoir right on schedule, and so far she has sold more than a million books. Bill's memoir will be out next year, just as the party's desperation over the dwarfs hits bottom. Who else but Hillary, with Bill pulling the strings? With nothing but time on his hands, Bill is conniving to do for the missus what Pa Ferguson did for Ma in Texas, what George Wallace did for Lurleen in Alabama.

The notion that Ma Clinton can wait until 2008 is nuts, as any pol who remembers his blue-back arithmetic book could tell you. It's in the numbers. If a year in politics is an epoch, four years is eternity. To make 2008 happen, the Clintons would first have to pretend, convincingly, to work for the Democratic nominee next year while employing every trick in the shadows to sabotage his chances. If (horrors!) the Democrat wins, anyway, that would put Hillary's race off until 2012, when she will be pulling down Social Security. The year 2012 is in that long run when a lot of us will be dead.

The usual Hollywood types who mistake scripts and daydreams for the real world are casting about furiously for alternatives to the dwarfs, whom they see as a collection of last season's re-runs. Barry Diller, the Hollywood mogul who looks into the mirror and thinks he sees Dick Morris, is pushing, of all unlikely people, Tom Brokaw, the NBC news reader. "He's simply the greatest draft choice you could ever possibly imagine," he says of Mr. Brokaw. Nora Ephron, the screenwriter sitting up sleepless, maybe in Seattle, with visions of Mr. Brokaw leaping into the race, says breathlessly: "$20 million would come pouring in about a week." Mr. Brokaw, who has actually seen politics up close, knows better: "I'm not running for anything, anywhere."

The one dark horse who is anything but dark is an attractive old soldier with visions of the White House Mess. Wesley Clark, the one-time commander of NATO and sometime military hero (Bosnia, et al.), is trying to organize his own draft. "When you are looking at moving into a field where you've never been before, when you see things like this forming," he tells the New York Observer, "it makes you seriously consider your options." (When you move into a field where you've never been before, you often see things that aren't there.)

The landscape of history is littered with the corpses of generals who thought they were destined for civilian glory, and Dwight D. Eisenhower was the only general of his century to actually make it to the bigs.

But Wesley Clark, in addition to his distinguished Christian name, has other things going for him. He's from Arkansas (he would just as soon you not notice), and he speaks well, looks terrific, and brings just what Hillary needs to her candidacy, which certain Little Rock folk say is exactly what's in the works. They see Bill Clinton's hand, barely hidden, making Wesley Clark happen.

Such an attractive general would give the Clintons the cover they've never had to soften public outrage over their well-known contempt for the military, their utter lack of understanding of why someone would sacrifice himself merely for God and country.

Mr. Clark is hardly a stranger to the Clintons, having been at Oxford as a Rhodes scholar with the ex-prez. He has all the right credentials: first in his class at West Point, a term as Alexander Haig's aide-de-camp, a well-greased route to the top in the military superstructure. There's nothing in his record to indicate that he's what one colleague calls the "thump-the-sumbitch in the head with a 2 by 4 on the first hit so he's seeing stars," ordinarily who you have to be to succeed in presidential politics.

That won't matter this time. The lady from New York (via Little Rock) is that. Wesley Clark only has to sit there and look pretty.



To: calgal who wrote (3526)7/20/2003 4:02:59 PM
From: Tadsamillionaire  Respond to of 10965
 
Declaration Principles
Abraham Lincoln said, in Independence Hall, February 22nd, 1861: "I never had a feeling politically that did not spring from the sentiments embodied in the Declaration of Independence."
All men are CREATED equal. Hence they have equal natural rights as a gift of the CREATOR.

Our duty to seek and follow the will of the Creator is prior to all government. Accordingly, so is the liberty of religious conscience.

The authority of the Creator as prior to all civil society and human authority must be respected for liberty to endure.

There is a natural right to life, prior to all positive law, including the Constitution.

There is a natural right to acquire, secure, and use property for safety and happiness.

Men have a right and a duty to form governments to secure their rights, and to assist one another in striving for happiness.

Men are authorized by the Creator to defend these rights, and accordingly, so are the governments they form. From this authority proceeds the right and duty to defend national sovereignty and security.

Governments are made legitimate by the consent of the free and equal persons who form and sustain them. Governmental powers are always to be understood as a delegation from the persons who compact to form the political community.

To enjoy the right of political self-government, men must be capable of personal self-government--the virtue of self-control. A people without decency cannot be secure in its liberty.

The institutions by which the life of liberty is fostered, especially the marriage-based two-parent family, the churches, and other associations aiming at the good life, are to be protected and cherished.

The vocation of citizenship in a free republic is noble and honorable. Public service, especially in the defense of the rule of law, merits praise and respect.

The right to self-government entails the right to arms by which tyranny can be resisted and new government established when necessary.

Governments may fail in many ways and still be tolerated. Peace is a precious good, and the people may be well advised to be patient with occasional governmental abuse to avoid rashly unleashing the season of popular passion and violence that will accompany any change in the fundamental form of government.

But the worst failures, tending irrevocably to excessive concentration of power, consolidating the branches and depriving the people of its liberty, or withdrawing the protection of the laws from the people, constitute tyranny or anarchy, and may and sometimes should be resisted, even to the point of rebellion, as our Founders declared.

Free speech and a free press are both required for the practice of responsible liberty, as necessary means by which the people can act together to govern themselves according to the laws of nature and of nature's God.

All persons have a right to equal treatment under the laws without regard to race, creed, or ethnicity.

It is the duty of the people, individually and in their associations, private and public, to declare the principles of self-government, including the fundamental American creed that our liberties come as a gift of the Creator.

Personal religious belief is not a requirement for American citizenship, but acknowledgment of our national belief that human equality and rights come from an authority beyond human will is a moral duty of citizenship. Its rejection constitutes a denial of natural rights and human equality, and is inconsistent with ordered liberty.

On the basis of these principles, we would like to add a new term to American grassroots politics: DECLARATIONIST. A "Declarationist" is anyone who believes in the principles of the American Republic as outlined in the Declaration of Independence.

renewamerica.tv