Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (106585)	7/20/2003 4:12:23 AM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

This is so arm-chair silly I won't respond.

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (106585)	7/20/2003 4:39:15 AM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

On the face of it, this does sound reasonable, that the Bush admin would refuse to negotiate alone with NK, in favour of a broader based table, all the interested parties hearing every word However, in light of Bush admin's performance in re Iraq, and this angle you state having come from Bush admin, you have to ask yourself, what are they not telling us here ...... just not up on current detail in re NK-US, and while it is taken for granted that NK will be lying through their teeth, the record to date of the PNAC bunch is not exactly exemplary either Here's another effect of the Bushmouth, that 'axis of evil' speech ...... it was Barbara Frum's kid who wrote that speech you know, says he invented the phrase, stuck in Iraq and Iran, presumably they gave him a PNAC programme when he got the job, but then later just before Bush reads this, somebody else stuck in the north koreans, felt the term 'axis' needed three wheels .... funny how things work, eh .... i would not wish negotiating with these people on my worst enemy