SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (106826)7/21/2003 12:27:44 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Instead, the analysis strongly suggested the gas originated from a second, secret plant, perhaps buried in the mountains, the paper said.

How long do you think it took to build such a "secret plant".. YEARS.. GST.. YEARS!!!

Thus, it's existence would be further evidence of a long-standing effort by Kim Jong Il to circumvent his obligations related to those previous "talks" Clinton and Carter engaged his father in.

And that just confirms that he NEVER intended to abide by those agreements. Just get the US (and others) to spend $5 Billion building him a light water reactor, and continue to provide fuel for his tanks.

Real results from "talking" GST... I'm so encouraged..

Hawk



To: GST who wrote (106826)7/21/2003 11:37:55 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 

Strong evidence has emerged that North Korea (news - web sites) may have built a second, secret plant for producing weapons-grade plutonium

I've been saying all along that the N. Koreans would not have openly announced their nuclear program unless they had a backup facility for Yongbyon. An air strike is just too obvious an option.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News