Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (158644)	7/21/2003 11:35:53 AM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

If Saddam Hussein is unwilling to bend to the international community's already existing order, then he will have invited enforcement, even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act. John Kerry, Sept 6, 2002 Now you're saying he didn't really mean that? Or just that it doesn't count because if he were president he would have asked nicely and the UN would have gone along? ROTFL BTW: Regime change in Iraq is a worthy goal. There is ...no question that Saddam Hussein continues to pursue weapons of mass destruction, and his success can threaten both our interests in the region and our security at home. -John Kerry, Sept 6, 2002 I guess he didn't really mean it when he made these statements either. After all, that would mean all that supposedly "phony" evidence that came later didn't matter.