SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: T L Comiskey who wrote (22832)7/21/2003 11:26:28 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
The Party of Sabotage
By David Horowitz
FrontPageMagazine.com | July 21, 2003
From September to March, the Democratic Party played the classic role of appeasers, seeking every excuse possible not to call Saddam Hussein's bluff or call him to account for his defiance of international agreements. This was no different from the role Neville Chamberlain carved out in the 1930s as Hitler defied one international arms control agreement after another on his march to war. Their appeasement threatened to undermine the international security order, and would have done so if George Bush had buckled to their pressures.

In the 1930s, the Communist left also organized a "peace" movement to protest American, British and French "militarism" and keep the Western powers from arming to stop Hitler. Their agenda was to protect Stalin and to put pressure on the appeasers to rely on negotiation and other failed measures. The Communists' peace organization was called the World Congress Against Imperialist War. Its American version was the Committee for the World Congress Against War (note the ellision of "Imperialist" to make the sell to the fellow travelers easy). It was led by the Susan Sarandons and Susan Sontags of the day -- literary icons like Sherwood Anderson and Theodore Dreiser who were willing tools of Stalin's designs.

As the Iraq war approached, this magazine warned that the neo-communist left was making plans to move to the next stage of "resistance" and sabotage the war effort. The left did, in fact, organize law-breaking demonstrations in downtown business centers that would have made al-Qaeda's work easy (by tying up Homeland Security personnel) if the war had not been brought to a swift and happy conclusion by the forces Bush and Rumsfeld set in motion. Since the left's own war with America is permanent, they have now turned their efforts to undermining the peace and specifically America's efforts to reshape the Middle East and make it a less safe harbor for our terrorist enemies.

Unfortunately, the Democratic Party has followed suit in its own timid way, shedding the mantle of appeasement to become the party of sabotage. Not a day has gone by since American forces liberated Iraq that Democrats have not attempted to undermine the leadership that brought about the victory. The greatest triumph of American policy since the end of the Cold War has become the unending target of Democratic snipers -- among them all its presidential nominees and its chief congressional spokesmen .

The war cost too much; the rationale for the war was deceptive; the President is liar.

We want congressional investigations to tie up the Administration, distract it from its war tasks, and encourage our enemies.

No act of Democratic perfidy has been more disgraceful than Dick Gephardt's statement in Iowa -- echoed by other Democratic figures -- that the President's credibility was a crucial element of the nation's security and that this President had lied.

It was a disgrace on many counts. It was a lie to say that this President had lied. The famous statement about Niger uranium was in fact a statement about a British intelligence report concerning Niger uranium. The statement about British intelligence was true. The British are still supporting their report. The attacks on the statement are political sabotage of the commander-in-chief. In time of war.

Second, the same Dick Gephardt and the other Democratic hypocrites, without exception, went to the wall to defend Bill Clinton's lies about war and peace, to shield him from any inquiry into his missile strikes in the Sudan and in other countries -- strikes that were unauthorized and where the entire premise of the strikes was proven to be false.What Democrat manifested concern about the national security implications of Clinton's credibility during the Lewinsky mess? Which one of them cooperated with the congressional investigations (conducted in advance of any war) into the massive illegal funding of the Clinton campaign by agents of the Chinese military and intelligence services, or into the lax security policies that resulted in China's theft of our entire nuclear arsenal? The answer is none did. America's national security is the lowest priority on the Democratic Party agenda. In this, Ann Coulter is absolutely right.

For the record, the United States did not go to war with Iraq because Iraq made a uranium deal with Niger or because Iraq did or did not have weapons of mass destruction. It went to war with Iraq to implement UN resolution 1441 -- as authorized by a unanimous vote of the UN Security Council and for the reasons stated by Democratic Senator Bob Graham who is now one of the President's chief and most unprincipled attackers.

This what Graham said on Fox News Sunday (6/23/04): "What we're concerned about with Iraq is its intention and capabilities to develop weapons of mass destruction, and the merger of that capability with terrorist groups, that is the ultimate nightmare scenario."

What the Democratic Party is doing now is sabotaging the war on terror. The securing of Iraq -- which borders two terrorist states (Syria and Iran) -- is absolutely crucial for everything that will follow, including the stabilization of the Middle East and the disarming of Islamic terrorists.

It is a national tragedy that in this hour of national crisis the Democratic Party does not have a single statesman who might follow the example of Tony Blair and stand up to the saboteurs and speak out for a bi-partisan front against those who have sworn to destroy us. That Democrats are not rallying around the President in its efforts to carry on the work of peace is an unforgiveable betrayal.

This is the final destructive legacy of the narcissistic and feckless leadership of Carter, Clinton and Gore. It is they who set the bad example in the first place. And it is they who have never really shed the McGovern delusion that in the final analysis America is the root cause of all the root causes that inspire our enemies to attack us.

frontpagemagazine.com



To: T L Comiskey who wrote (22832)7/21/2003 11:45:46 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Iraqis embark on shopping spree
Imports, dollars propel commerce to new level

chicagotribune.com.

By Laurie Goering
Tribune foreign correspondent

July 20, 2003

BAGHDAD -- Hassan Kadhem, a former antiques dealer, knows a good business opportunity when he sees one. When Saddam Hussein's regime disappeared, and the country's Draconian tax and customs laws went with it, Kadhem traded the past for the future.

As duty-free goods began streaming over Iraq's borders from Jordan and Turkey, he opened a shop selling satellite dishes, banned in Iraq under Hussein, and air conditioners, which used to carry an 85 percent import charge.

Today, with temperatures topping 110 degrees and Iraqis eager to tap into once-banned international news and entertainment, Kadhem's Baghdad shop makes $200,000 to $250,000 a month in sales. A quarter of that is profit.

"We have a good business now," said Kadhem, 31, whose prewar sales rarely passed $2,000 a month. "Prices are down, and people have dollars. All their salary is going to this."

In the three months since the end of Hussein's government, Baghdad has turned into a giant free market shopping zone.

Customers denied imported goods because of years of U.S. sanctions, hefty Iraqi customs charges and poverty are racing to buy refrigerators, air conditioners, washing machines, televisions and CD players.

Outside appliance shops in the city, huge piles of boxed chest freezers, and broiler ovens and stoves nearly block the sidewalks. Half of the cars in the city seem to have satellite dishes on the roof, held in place by eager hands thrust through windows. Even everyday goods, from milk to meat to clothing, are cheaper.

"Prices are going down on everything. There are no taxes, no customs," said Mohammed Joad, 65, a retired customs official who works at a fabric store in one of the city's biggest appliance districts.

"It's a good time to be a buyer in Iraq," he said, gesturing out the door at the sea of double-parked cars outside, their owners shoving boxes into trunks. "Everyone is on the streets."

Baghdad's boom has been fueled in part by the elimination of Iraqi sales taxes, which once averaged 5 to 10 percent, and customs duties, which soared to 50 percent on imported televisions and refrigerators, and 85 percent on air conditioners. With no government to impose taxes or duties, prices for many consumer goods have fallen by up to 60 percent.

The buying spree also has been spurred by an influx of U.S. cash into Iraq's economy. For about two months, the U.S.-led coalition running Iraq has been paying former and current government workers' salaries, mainly in dollars.

While many workers are receiving salaries commensurate with their old paychecks, others--particularly teachers, retirees and other dramatically underpaid groups--have received huge raises. Joad, who used to get a $2-a-month pension from Iraq's government, now gets $40 a month. With that, and some savings, he has bought an air conditioner and a boombox for his wife.

U.S. cash streams in

The influx of U.S. cash--and money looted from Iraqi's banks at the end of the war--also has led to a strengthening of the Iraqi dinar, which has helped put consumer goods within reach of even those who aren't getting U.S. dollars.

The result is that many families who haven't bought appliances in years are venturing into the shops, and families with cash to spare are stocking up, before Iraq gets a new government and a new tax and customs structure. Even the U.S. interim administration and international non-governmental organizations are adding to the boom. Their employees are buying air conditioners and office furniture to replace things looted from the offices, ministries and the houses they are taking over.

Mohammed Ali, 50, an Iraqi electrical plant worker, spent an evening recently strolling with his wife, Alia Laiby, amid the piles of boxes on Baghdad's sidewalks, looking for a new washing machine.

The last one they owned, they said, broke 10 years ago, and since that time Laiby has been doing the washing by hand. In the past two months, however, the couple, both electrical workers, have received $480 in U.S. salary payments, about $80 more than normal, and they had enough to buy a $160 washing machine.

"I feel richer now," Ali said. "If they keep paying us in dollars, our life will get better."

Iraq's import boom hasn't been good for everyone. Most Iraqi factories, some of them looted, remain closed, and prospects for their reopening are dim until there is a new government. Hundreds of thousands of workers at the plants are out of jobs.

Other factories that have reopened face stiff competition from imports and are struggling to adapt to a changing market.

The beverage market

Abdul Karim Ali, one of six owners of the private Al Murad soft drink bottling plant in Baghdad, said the flood of imported beverages initially drove down the selling price of a crate of his soft drinks nearly 20 percent.

Cola syrup, which the factory was once required to buy through one of Hussein's relatives, used to cost $215 a unit but now goes for $180 on the free market. Gas canisters, however, have gone from 10 cents a pound to $1, he said, because of costlier fuel and transport problems.

Still, his factory is regaining market share, he said. Hot weather has driven up demand, and buyers are figuring out that his fresh sodas taste better than some of the outdated cans imported from Turkey and Iran, he said. Production is back to 100 percent, and all 56 plant workers are on the job.

Abdul Karim Ali hopes Iraq's new government can find a middle ground between the controls of Hussein's regime and the free market chaos ruling Baghdad.

"Everyone likes free markets, but we need a few controls," he said, particularly in regards to health standards and other consumer protections. "We need something between 100 percent control and 100 percent free markets."

Copyright © 2003, Chicago Tribune