SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (22845)7/21/2003 3:13:30 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
'Honest broker' raises UN profile in Iraq
By Robert McMahon

NEW YORK - The United Nations Security Council resolution that legitimized the United States-led administration in Iraq granted the United Nations a central humanitarian role, but only loosely defined political tasks. Some critics saw the measure's calls for the UN to facilitate various reconstruction and political efforts as confirmation that the world body would have a limited role.

But the choice of veteran UN diplomat Sergio Vieira de Mello to serve as special envoy - backed by the United States - was a sign that the UN would not be a silent partner to the US-led coalition in Iraq. Vieira de Mello, a Brazilian diplomat, has worked on some of the UN's toughest missions during a 34-year career. Six weeks into his assignment in Iraq, UN observers say, he has demonstrated political skill in raising the profile of the UN and its influence is likely to grow.

Vieira de Mello was instrumental in the selection of representatives of the newly-formed 25-member Iraqi Governing Council, and he is reported to have advised the US administrator of Iraq, L Paul Bremer, to give the council a set of real powers to affirm its standing as a sovereign representative body. A UN electoral team will visit Baghdad early next month to consult members of the council as they take steps toward drafting a constitution and organizing elections.

Simon Chesterman studies transitional administrations for the International Peace Academy, an independent research institute based in New York. He tells RFE/RL that Vieira de Mello's actions have impressed Washington while enhancing the UN's stature.

"What Sergio, I think, is trying to do is to act as an honest broker and really that's what the United States needs in Iraq right now and I think that's why what he's doing is acceptable [to Washington] because every step that the UN takes towards blessing the political process that is going on in Iraq will make it more acceptable internationally and potentially more acceptable locally."

Vieira de Mello is temporarily on leave from his post as UN high commissioner for human rights. Previously, as UN special representative, he helped guide the former Indonesian province of East Timor to independence last year. He also served as the first UN administrator in Kosovo in 1999.

Chesterman says that these postconflict experiences have given Vieira de Mello a keen understanding of the importance of acting decisively when transferring power. "The lessons that Sergio Vieira de Mello has learned from a brief period in Kosovo and a much longer period in East Timor I think are that the first thing you need in a situation like this is political clarity. The most disastrous situation in any of these post-conflict operations has usually been political ambiguity."

Vieira de Mello has moved regularly around the country, meeting Iraq's numerous factional and religious leaders to sample the range of opinions. He spent last week meeting with leaders in the neighboring countries of Saudi Arabia, Syria and Iran.

In some cases, the UN envoy has access to key figures unavailable to Bremer, says William Luers, a former diplomat and president of the UN Association think tank. He says that Vieira de Mello is "a master at this" and suspects he will "play down his role vis-a-vis [Bremer] but be much more in touch with the new [Iraqi] national council [and] with other governments who are interested". Luers says that Vieira de Mello "can do that in ways that Bremer cannot because Bremer doesn't know these players. He doesn't know how to work it."

If the new governing council gains broad legitimacy internationally, that could boost the success of a crucial donor conference for Iraq planned for October. In addition to reconstruction assistance, US officials have made it clear they are seeking more international support for peacekeeping in Iraq.

India, France and Germany - countries that opposed the war in Iraq - say that they cannot contribute troops without a broader UN mandate. US officials have said Security Council Resolution 1483, adopted in May, gives UN members the legitimacy they need to support coalition efforts. But US Secretary of State Colin Powell also said that Washington was holding talks with other governments on a possible new UN resolution on Iraq.

Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said during a visit to Cairo that he favored expanding the UN's role. "We believe it is necessary to speed up the process of handing over the power to legitimate representatives of the Iraqi people, and for that purpose it is necessary to increase the role of the United Nations in the Iraqi settlement process."

Iranian President Mohammad Khatami said after talks with Vieira de Mello that the new Iraqi council should not be used to justify the continued occupation of Iraq by US and British forces. He said that Iran was "ready to cooperate with UN plans in the region" and called for a transfer of power under UN leadership to an Iraqi democratic national regime.

Copyright (c) 2002, RFE/RL Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington DC 20036



To: epicure who wrote (22845)7/21/2003 4:16:46 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
The Future of Iraq, in Outline
From the July 28, 2003 issue: Jerry Bremer, administrator in a hurry.
by Stephen F. Hayes
07/28/2003, Volume 008, Issue 44
Baghdad
SPEND ANY TIME with Jerry Bremer and you'll notice two things. He thinks and speaks in outlines. And he compresses any timetable he's given, often cutting it in half.

So when Bernie Kerik, former New York City police commissioner and current security adviser to the Coalition Provisional Authority, told Bremer he would need four years to "stand up" 70,000 police officers across free Iraq, Bremer had a counterproposal: 18 months.

Bremer, President Bush's envoy to Iraq and the head of the Authority, discussed security--and almost a dozen other topics--in his office on July 17. Wearing tan hiking boots and a navy blue suit, he spoke for nearly an hour with six journalists traveling with Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz. Bremer's office is palatial, literally. It's located in what everyone here calls the "four-headed Saddam palace," so named for the massive sculptures perched atop the building's four towers featuring the deposed dictator in headgear resembling a pith helmet. The decoration is sparse, and the bookshelves that stretch to the 30-foot ceilings are mostly empty, except for a box of bran flakes and several books, including Rudy Giuliani's "Leadership." The furnishings are just the essentials--an oversized desk at one end and a round table with seven regal, high-backed armchairs at the other, a coat hanger with a handful of ties, a royal blue espresso maker.

After a brief editorial comment about news reports to the effect that his team lacks a strategy--they're "nonsense"--Bremer shifted to his outline. "We've got to do three things," he began. "We have to establish a sense of security and stability in the country. We have to, secondly, begin the process of economic reform. And we have to move along on transition to a democratic political structure."

Bremer poses questions and answers them. On security: "Where is our problem? Our problem is largely confined to what is called the 'Sunni Triangle' or the 'Sunni heartland.'" He continues: "What is our problem? There are two problems. They are both structural. One is, this is the one part of the country that we didn't fight over. By the time we got north of Baghdad, the two Republican Guard divisions that were stationed there faded away. So, we never conquered that area like we conquered the rest of the country. Secondly, this is the traditional support area for the Baath party. This is where Saddam's tribal base was. This is where a lot of the military industrial complex is located. . . . That's where the problem is. It's not elsewhere. It's there."

The remnants of the regime, Bremer believes, are targeting coalition successes. Naturally, he gives three examples. The American soldier killed at Baghdad University "was killed because they don't want us to have the universities working." The mayor of Haditha and his son were executed because he was cooperating with the coalition. And the bombing at the police academy in Fallujah was the result of progress the coalition has made in establishing an Iraqi police force.

On politics, Bremer argues that the process must have two characteristics. "It has got to be an Iraqi process, a constitution written by the Iraqis for the Iraqis. And it has got to be seen as a process which is legitimate in the eyes of the Iraqi people." Bremer has been reluctant to guess publicly how long this process will take. But in answering questions, he suggested that writing a constitution could take less than eight months. That compact time frame will be necessary if Iraq is to hold elections within a year, something Bremer hinted is possible.

Bremer seems well aware of the skeptical coverage his efforts are receiving in the American media. He is eager to dispel myths before they gel into conventional wisdom, but for someone working 18-hour days and to whom the concept of "weekend" is a memory, his critiques are more matter-of-fact than bitter. "I keep reading in the press that we are somehow late or behind schedule," he says of the political transition. "I said when I got here on May 13 that we would have a political council, we then called it, inplace by the middle of July. We had iton July 13, basically right on schedule."

Bremer told us that revitalizing the Iraqi economy would be the most difficult challenge his team faces. The destruction comes not from the war--"almost no damage from the war," he says--but from a "comprehensively mismanaged economy over 35 years." The devastation, Bremer contends, picking up his outline where he left off, "goes across the entire economy, and it means two things. Number one, the infrastructure is very fragile because there is almost no redundancy built in, which makes it very susceptible to political sabotage for the time being. And two, it means we are going to have to devote extraordinary amounts of money to rebuilding infrastructure in the next 5 to 10 years, which is going to be extremely expensive."

If a 10-year time frame is realistic for infrastructure investment, the immediate priority of the coalition is evidently to turn over day-to-day governing responsibilities to Iraqis as soon as possible. When I asked one Bremer deputy about his boss's accelerated pace, he responded sarcastically: "You noticed?" Still, officials here bristle at the suggestion that they are preparing to leave anytime soon. "That's not going to happen," says one.

Some members of the new 25-member Governing Council are discouraged that returning the country to Iraqis is not happening faster. Ahmed Chalabi, head of the Iraqi National Congress, has made clear that he wants more Iraqi involvement now, particularly as the coalition continues to assemble security forces throughout the country.

Bremer is realistic--"We do have a security problem," he says--but not discouraged. "When I got to Baghdad eight weeks ago," says Bremer, "the city was burning. It was on fire. There was no traffic in the city, other than coalition vehicles. And I slept with earplugs at night because of the gunfire. This is a remarkably better place in all three aspects."

Stephen F. Hayes is a staff writer at The Weekly Standard.



To: epicure who wrote (22845)7/21/2003 8:19:55 PM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 89467
 
Before this becomes a quagmire, what is the US going to do?

"Before this becomes a quagmire"

Hmmm...Before?

"what is the US going to do?"

Unfortunately, very little. The neo-cons see no reason to have an exit strategy. If anything, they want to use Iraq as a "springboard" to further commitments. So, to be irretrievable enmeshed in Iraq, has been a desired goal. After all, we want the hegemony to survive a change in admins. To the best of my ability to understand, you need to have a much bigger commitment “in place on the ground”, by the end of a Bush second term Big enough, “there is no turning back”.

Of course all of these “plans” were made in the fantasy land of Pentagon “contingency plans” and think tank reports. Now, that fantasy has started to meet reality, and produced some unanticipated “friction”, we’ll see. So far, persevere is all I hear.

Persevere with a Tar Baby! Now, that’s a strategy.

JMO

lurqer