Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1728)	7/21/2003 4:11:41 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Respond to of 3143

Do you think that the criminal code will supercede laws pertaining to securities in your case? I haven't filed my case under securities laws in any way, shape or form, so they do not apply here when proving the causes of action, and liability. And to be honest with you, from their pleadings, I am not too sure the defendants understand exactly what that means. Or maybe they do. We are talking about, in general terms here, the laws against misleading advertising and deceptive trade practices, unjust enrichment, civil conspiracy, breach of the duties of good faith and fair dealing and most of all the Law of Tort. The brokers tortiously interfered in the investment advice, destroying it. In that respect, this case is simple and straightforward: payments were made to corrupt the advice against those who paid for it and had a right to get what they paid for. The brokers had no right to interfere in that advice, they caused many substantial damages, and are therefore liable for those damages, plus punitive/exemplary damages as well.