SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (106985)7/21/2003 5:58:33 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Strictly speaking, I suppose you are correct. "Unilateral talk" is our current policy. We talk, others are supposed to listen. We don't listen. Rumsfeld is a perfect example of perfect staffing to pursue a policy of "unilateral talk". "Talks" in which more than one party speaks would be a big step forward -- any talks. All we have now is talk -- big, empty talk.



To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (106985)7/21/2003 6:04:27 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Who do you think forged and planted the phony uranium documents?? <<Did it start with a break-in? On the morning of Jan. 2, 2001, Italian police discovered that the Niger Embassy in Rome had been ransacked. Not much was reported missing—only a watch and two bottles of perfume—but someone had apparently rifled through embassy papers, leaving them strewn about the floor.>>

msnbc.com



To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (106985)7/21/2003 6:59:10 PM
From: Sig  Respond to of 281500
 
<<hat's unilateral talks: "I talk, you listen">>>
Like married people do?. You could have saved a lot of explaining if you had said that