Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SirWalterRalegh who wrote (107006)	7/21/2003 8:14:42 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	Respond to of 281500

<.....anyone who... kills, .... should be wacked...a few less won't be missed> another humanitarian...

To: SirWalterRalegh who wrote (107006)	7/22/2003 4:07:07 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

<Another brilliant analysis to a totally ignorant respondee.> Rick, while I agree my analysis was brilliant, some would think that both the brilliance of my analysis and the ignorance of the respondee were exaggerated. Wild admiration is acceptable in Foreign Affairs but "totally ignorant respondee" is an exaggeration which isn't acceptable in terms of WWKT [What Would Ken Think]. Since you made the comment to me about somebody I'd responded to, I think I should point out the WWKT principle. To others who also make derogatory personal comment, please refrain from doing so. Try raving, then putting it on edit mode and going back over it and removing the personal stuff because it doesn't add anything to the discussions. You'll be happier with what you end up writing. Carl, this means you! Not to mention various others from time to time and to a greater or lesser extent. Give yourselves the WWKT test and if your post fails the test, clean it up. In appreciation, Mqurice