Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (107106)	7/22/2003 10:01:31 AM
From: Win Smith	Respond to of 281500

It's a conspiracy, I guess. The war cheerleaders just don't get no respect.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (107106)	7/22/2003 12:50:25 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

In notice that you did not suggest that it could have been done by the "pro-war" side -- interesting. As for your post, the French could have done this, I agree. They have the capability and with some effort you could conjure up a motive. Or somebody else aiming to embarrass the "pro-war" side could have done it. It is also possible that somebody was looking very, very hard for a way to say they had "proof" that Saddam was trying to buy uranium. Nixon was brought down by a burglary and cover-up -- you wouldn't think that two Republican administrations would make the same mistake -- that would be stupid, not to mention treason. If somebody was trying to frame the Government of the United States, or if an American was committing treason, these are serious issues and I certainly hope that no effort will be spared to discover who exactly did this. Do you think we can count on Bush to get to the bottom of this?