Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1779)	7/22/2003 12:36:41 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Respond to of 3143

I asked the Superior Court judge be removed; now we're before the Justices of the Court of Appeal. Not the same thing, obviously. I have said that the judge gave advice to a party to the proceedings. That is subject to interpretation I am sure, but if a court rules the judge did so, then that is clear grounds for disqualification under the C.C.P. So is apparent bias, which is up to a court to decide also, their interpretation. No, I don't think the judge would feel insulted. He's a professional jurist and I believe he would understand my reasoning in making such a motion. He may not agree, but a judge above all others I would think understands plaintiffs and defendants taking every proper procedural step to protect their interests during litigation.