Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Tara who wrote (1783)	7/22/2003 12:39:23 PM
From: JustTradeEm	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3143

Jon, why not respond to this one ? Message 19132443 JB

To: Jon Tara who wrote (1783)	7/22/2003 2:43:34 PM
From: Yogizuna	Respond to of 3143

>>> OT - Yogi, the police cannot protect us everywhere we go. Sensible people avoid going to dangerous areas unnecessarily. The victim isn't legally responsible for harm done to them. But they certainly are foolish for letting it happen when it could be easily avoided. They certainly are personally responsible. Someone goes to the bad part of town, again and again, looking for trouble, and they get beat-up, do you blame the cops for not doing their job? Because they didn't provide a personal body guard? No, in this hypothetical case, the victim, through their irresponsibility, is personally responsible for their situation. Nevertheless, the authorities will always do their part. They will deliver the body to the appropriate relatives and try their darndest to catch the criminals. And, no, I'm not threatening anyone. This is an off-topic discussion in response to your comment. <<< In my opinion, you are comparing "apples and oranges" with that argument. So please tell me, how is when supposed to know when they are entering a "bad neighborhood" on the Internet?