Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1918)	7/22/2003 5:16:27 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3143

Interesting. I never said your questions were unimportant. The giving of advice for a fee is not illegal. Being wrong is not illegal - except when you deliberately ensure that you are wrong. Selling a service for fees and then not providing that service, deliberately issuing a worthless service to defraud your clients is illegal. See the difference? There won't be claims against me because I did not issue kickback advice. In fact, I was nearly booted from TP for criticizing CyberTrader, and was repeatedly admonished for only making 2 or 3 recs a day.

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1918)	7/22/2003 5:25:25 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3143

So now let's go back to the fact that you were doing exactly what you are accusing the defendants of doing. That's a libelous statement, Jorj. I did not issue advice I knew to be worthless, quite the contrary. I did not contract for kickbacks with brokerage firms. I did not trade against my own clients through offshore accounts. I have not committed the multiple felonies of perjury, obstruction of justice and abuse of IRS procedure.