Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (1919)	7/22/2003 5:49:52 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3143

nope, you just ignored the questions...and they are far more relevant than whether or not someone is a software engineer. In addition to the kickback for order flow (churninng) allegation, are you also suggesting that they or their agents were taking opposite trades than what was recommended? In other words, trading against you?

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (1919)	7/22/2003 6:06:38 PM
From: Yogizuna	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3143

>>> The giving of advice for a fee is not illegal. Being wrong is not illegal - except when you deliberately ensure that you are wrong. Selling a service for fees and then not providing that service, deliberately issuing a worthless service to defraud your clients is illegal. See the difference? <<< I have sadly come to the conclusion "they" will never see the obvious difference, unless they receive brain transplants! :) Hang in there, you are in the right, even if you should end up losing the whole ball of wax, you were still doing the right thing to go after them legally.