SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1985)7/22/2003 7:18:14 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3143
 
I guess the New York Times published these allegations, TWICE, just for the Hell of it. I was the source of that last article, NYT investigated these claims and published them in full, including against Schwab for kickbacks, and Terra Nova for front-running.

Then a top securities firm discussed these claims with me for more than a year, and filed these claims on a 100% contingent basis without being paid a single cent.

Well, we'll see if they are proved. So far, I've proved them to some fairly powerful neutral parties. Maybe that should be your Litigation Indicator, amigo.



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1985)7/24/2003 4:23:48 PM
From: Yogizuna  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3143
 
I do not have the time to engage in a "point by point" debate with you about every aspect of this case I have read about, but I will say if I were on a jury regarding this case, I would be leaning towards conviction at this point.
Of course many other things could come out in the fullness of time which could change my opinion, but that is what "could be" at this point...


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News