To: TheStockStalker who wrote (2024 ) 7/22/2003 8:33:43 PM From: CountofMoneyCristo Read Replies (1) | Respond to Mr. Stalker, you are he that does not seem to get it. I became an analyst to prove something to myself and others, that, without all of this well-nigh unimaginable fraud, traders would have been making a killing. You think the fact that I was paid $2,500/month by each client is a fact that weakens my case? You don't even begin to see how long and how hard I worked to prove this case. MY WORK AS AN ANALYST PROVES THIS CASE BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT. I established Stock Operators in many ways to prove these claims. You're damned right I would have made a lot more money trading my own recommendations than selling the advice, and risking that the defendants would try to destroy my company, which in the end they succeeded in doing. Yes, that's right. I spoke with an attorney two weeks ago and he asked me why I have not sued the defendants for what they did destroying Stock Operators. I am considering that now, as well. They tried to destroy Stock Operators because it was the only prominent site not taking kickbacks, in fact expressly forbidding them, and analyst trading. So I was a great danger to their scheme. So they attacked my company. How do you think that will look. I have quite a huge mountain of records demonstrating this activity, including two computers that were deliberately attacked by defendant hackers trying to infect them. Think there is no electronic trail? We'll see.
