To: tejek who wrote (172372 ) 7/23/2003 11:05:22 AM From: i-node Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573076 That has not been determined. It is clear that Dr. David Kay has significant news concerning WMD. Let's see what that news turns out to be. Link please. I'd recommend you watch the news. Actually, I prefer to let you and the other liberals continue letting out enough rope to hang yourselves. But here is a taste:Another story that didn't make the media pipeline was CIA inspector David Kay's interview with NBC's "Nightly News" anchor Tom Brokaw. Easily as important, if not more, than the June 25th story about the unearthing of documents and a gas centrifuge under the rose bush of Iraqi scientist Mahdi Obeidi, this interview should have had the effect of the long sought "smoking gun" the WMD starved media has been lusting for. According to David Kay, "the Iraqi's seem to keep documents on even the most damning evidence," reports Tom Brokaw. Brokaw adds this: This is the mother lode, an estimated seven and a half miles of documents, many of them collected by US military from {Iraq's} official buildings, but many others handed over by Iraqi civilians." Unwilling to go public as of yet with this massive find, Kay wants the evidence to measure up to the much ballyhooed "smoking gun" standard of an unbelieving media. Kay: "I've already seen enough to convince me, but that's not the standard. I've got to convince everyone of that." Brokaw: "How long is that going to take?" Kay: "No longer than it takes." Brokaw: "Six months?" Kay: "I think we will have a substantial body of evidence before six months." So, amid the barrage of "where's the WMD's" from the media and Democrats, the former UN weapons inspector and current White House point man tapped to find those weapons says he will have a "substantial body of evidence" within six months. Where's the media to trumpet the discovery? Busily turning 16 words into the 21st century Watergate.