SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (172374)7/23/2003 11:43:08 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573213
 
This war has nothing to do with Clinton.

That's an absurd statement. Of course it does.


Where have you been? You claim to get the news. Bush started this war on flimsy info. He knew it and started the war anyway. Other people passed on that info btw......people like Powell and Clinton.

Clinton's failure to insist that Saddam comply with the UN requirements made a clear statement to Saddam: You can do anything you want to and the United States will tolerate it.

By your logic then, we should have found tons of WMD because like you said Clinton made "a clear statement to Saddam" that he could make WMD til the cows came home.

That said......your arguments are flimsier than the forged Niger documents.

If you don't want inspectors, just don't give them access. There will be no retribution. The United States has no will to enforce either the terms of the ceasefire or the UN Resolutions.

Just for chuckles let says that your argument holds some water..........then that situation all changed under Bush. The weapons inspectors went back in and were doing their job. Saddam knew there would be retribution if he did not cooperate. Bush and his clever dingalings got what they wanted........at least that's what we all thought. WRONG! That's not what Bush wanted. What did he want, David Ray?

Where are the WMD?

It is clear the WMD programs will be uncovered in due time.


How could you? I didn't say WMD programs nor did Bush before the war. How do you all live with your prevaricating?

Just as you did during the sandstorm, and like liberals always do, you are going off half-cocked. David Kay will present plenty of WMD findings when the time is right.

Tick tock tick tock tick tock...........

Obviously, Bush has made it clear to him he doesn't want the kind of partial releases of information that led to repeated PR disasters during the war.

Yes, because he doesn't run off half cocked and start wars on a dime. RIGHT!

As to Al Qaeda, there are clear links, weak though they may be. But the administration never attempted to suggest that Al Qaeda was a major reason for the war.

Not at first but when the Amer. public wasn't falling into line fast enough, those links got decidely stronger.

You seem to have a difficult time understanding that when you put in an incompetent Clinton for 8 years all those problems he created don't just go away the day he leaves office. As I've told you before, we'll be paying for his incompetence for many, many years to come.

I wonder if you will ever get who the real incompetent is? How could you ever know.......you think the guys setting up the Clinton mock library are cool guys.

Like I said before, its pathetic and trailer trash cheap!