Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (107477)	7/23/2003 3:01:04 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 281500

Care to name and vet the credibility for the UK's Chad/uranium claim? Or are you willing to trust, without being able to verify, that their Intel is credible? Jacob, there's a serious problem with your logic. JohnM positively said that Hersh's CIA "sources" were credible. Aside from the delicious irony I find in reading something written by John in which he supports the CIA as a source, I find the statement to be probably based purely on speculation. Therefore, I asked him "How do you know?" Naturally, he doesn't have a clue. Hence, his lack of a response, though I'm glad to see that you are picking up his cudgels. You won't find a similar statement on my part saying anyone's "Intel" is credible or vetting anything. I am hopefully wise and gray-headed enough to know I can't do such a thing, even if my naturally-ingrained cynicism were overcome by feverish emotion, as it seems happens to JohnM on occassion, this being but the latest example.