SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (107509)7/23/2003 4:41:23 PM
From: Rascal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The Saudi's were investors and business associates of Daddy's. (Bin Ladens - Carlyle)

The Saudi's didn't try to kill Daddy.

The Saudi's didn't need punishment for unfinished Gulf War events.

This is all personal, Freudian and flawed.

Rascal @zinger.com



To: Neocon who wrote (107509)7/23/2003 5:29:52 PM
From: Chas.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
don't think of it as us, the USA, needing the oil for ourselves so much, more like having Russia and France aware that we are now overseeing those huge reserves that they had very big coontracts against.Call it leverage...



To: Neocon who wrote (107509)7/23/2003 5:58:27 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Why are you posting this to me?
I was merely noting your epithetical alliteration.



To: Neocon who wrote (107509)7/23/2003 7:45:45 PM
From: ThirdEye  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Oh, come now Neo. You're way smarter than you're sounding here. We get to oversee the vast untapped reserves and use Iraq as a counterweight to Saudi oil influence and spread our dependence around a bit more. See? It is an attack on SA, after all.



To: Neocon who wrote (107509)7/24/2003 1:17:25 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Or we could have taken over Kuwait in an afternoon.

Tim