Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: frankw1900 who wrote (107636)	7/24/2003 6:30:44 AM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<<"It is difficult to call the bombing of the Chinese Embassy just an accident. But it is also dishonest to label it deliberate." -- (quoted from the article you posted)>> The Chinese never accepted that it was an accident -- to them that meant it was intentional. By calling it grandstanding you are way off the mark. They believed this was not an accident to the core of their beings -- that is a fact. The double standard is glaring. If the situation was reversed, if China bombed our embassy, and if we were convinced that it was intentional (or not an accident as the article you post tries to claim), I can absolutely assure you that the chorus of condemnation from the United States in general, and the neocons in particular, would last a lifetime.