SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (3624)7/24/2003 10:36:55 PM
From: Richard S  Respond to of 10965
 
Why would anyone expect McCain to say anything else?
Dean doesn't have McCain's sharp personality. If
McCain could almost beat Bush it seems that Dean would
do even better.



To: American Spirit who wrote (3624)7/25/2003 3:33:44 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 10965
 
Message 19147198



To: American Spirit who wrote (3624)7/26/2003 11:51:45 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 10965
 
Full-Page New York Times Ad "We Deserve the Truth" to Run

July 27, 2003; Lewis and Dorothy Cullman, George Soros
Sponsor Ad and Website

7/25/03 10:29:00 AM

To: National Desk

Contact: Dr. Morton H. Halperin of the Open Society Policy Center,
202-721-5602 or 202-285-7019 (mobile), Michael Vachon for George Soros,
917-679-3780 (mobile)

WASHINGTON, July 25 /U.S. Newswire/ -- A full-page advertisement in the
Sunday, July 27th, 2003 New York Times asks Americans to visit a new
website, wedeservethetruth.com, and urges them to contact their
Senators and Representatives to "get the truth" about the exaggerated and
false intelligence on which the Administration's case for the Iraq war was
based.

The advertisement titled "When the Nation Goes to War, The People Deserve
the Truth," contains a dozen statements made by President Bush, Vice
President Cheney, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, and Secretary of State
Colin Powell now called into question by subsequent disclosures and by
events in Iraq.

The statements include but go beyond the now discredited reference by
President Bush to the uranium imports from Africa.

Similar ads are scheduled for publication on July 27, 2003 in the St. Louis
Post-Dispatch and the Houston Chronicle.

The advertisement and website are sponsored by Dorothy and Lewis B.
Cullman, who are engaged in educational and philanthropic activities in New
York, and George Soros, Chairman of Soros Fund Management LLC.

A copy of the advertisement may be downloaded at
wedeservethetruth.com.

usnewswire.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (3624)7/26/2003 1:05:40 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 10965
 
Watching BushCo Crumble
___________________________________

Ratings slipping, economy tanking, lies spiraling, credibility shot.
Try not to cheer
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist
Friday, July 25, 2003
©2003 SF Gate
sfgate.com

This is what happens when it's all a house of cards.

This is what happens when you build your entire presidency on an intricate network of aww-shucks glibness and bad hair and cronyism and corporate fellatio and warmongering and sham enemies and economy-gutting policies and endless blank-eyed smirks that tell the world, every single day, whelp, sure 'nuff, the U.S. is full of it.

Shrub's ratings have dropped below 50 percent for the first (and probably not the last) time since they surged hugely right after 9/11 and he was hoisted in front of a wary America and puffed out his chest and pretended like he could find Afghanistan on a map and promised he would bomb every damn country on the planet that didn't have a McDonald's or an Exxon or a secret U.S. chemical-weapons deal.

Shrub's numbers are down. The nation is catching on. The armor of money and power is cracking. The smirk is waning. Dick's defibrillator is running on fumes.

And Karl Rove, Shrub's master strategist, is scrambling, rushing down hallways, sweating hard, mapping out lib-killer tactics and frantically redirecting blame (CIA! FBI! The NSA!) as nine Demo candidates have a field day knocking all of Shrub's shortcomings out of the ideological park.

Maybe it's the regular slew of lies. You know the ones: "proof" of uranium purchases, "proof" of Iraqi nuke facilities, "proof" of WMDs, poison gas, plus two quick and "painless" wars, a robust economy, women's rights, gay rights, America proud and strong and respected the world over, a nice shiny oil-sucking SUV for every flag-waving misguided Fox News-drugged American. Ha.

Funny how the BS can wear you down. Funny how it can make you feel like someone's been piling huge rocks on our collective chest for the past three years and stomping on them with ugly polished right-wing loafers until we can hardly breathe.

And all you have to do is ask any schoolteacher or grandparent or health-care worker or conscious sensual attuned soulful organism anywhere, and the answer is unavoidable:

The nation is gasping for air.

Cities are desperate, basic services are being slashed, schools are broke, the environment's molested, the GOP has promised a ridiculous array of cuts and dedicated billions they can't possibly deliver in light of inane tax cuts and the biggest deficit in U.S. history. Hey, how's your portfolio doing?

Maybe the slip, the change in national timbre, is due to all the recently uncovered and aforementioned misfirings of the GOP machine, that frighteningly rich and seemingly omnipotent team of multibillionaire CEO Bushites who bought the presidency in the first place and who have steered the conservative agenda so brilliantly, so ruthlessly to this point.

Until recently, they've managed to stay viciously on message, trashed every liberal cause, demonized every social program, overhyped every fear, desiccated the poor and the elderly and gays and women and called it all Christian largesse, compassionate conservatism, which of course we all now know means, whoops sorry about all the unemployment and the raped environment and the dead Iraqi children.

Or maybe it's all those U.S. soldiers, more dying every single day, outright brutal guerrilla warfare with no end in sight, tens of thousands of American soldiers stuck in miserable and war-torn Iraq for years to come, proving that BushCo's policy of perpetual unilateral war in the name of a sovereignty we no longer have is just plain dangerous, if not downright immoral. Iran? North Korea? Liberia? Saudi Arabia? Wanna make your own list?

Maybe it's that feeling that we've reached saturation, that the nation can't really absorb any more misinformation and misdirection and snide switcheroos, Osama to Saddam, nukes to uranium, WMD to WMD intent, serious threat to "liberation," brutish recession to "temporary downturn."

Maybe we've just had enough. Enough of the macho all-American gun-totin' faux-cowboy ethos that says, if we just beat [insert nation/minority/progressive viewpoint here] up enough, they'll get the message and get in line and start complying with U.S. demands and we can expand our empire and crush all comers and their wimpy objections, too.

It is not yet time for delicious plates of schadenfreude. It is not yet time to relish Junior's slide into abject failure and scathing ratings and one-term histrionics -- you know, just like those suffered by his dear old dad. We are still too fragile, the feelings too raw, the wounds too recent from the current administration's mugging of the country.

But we are healing fast. We are coming back to life. We are opening our blackened eyes, realizing we have been massively and systematically and enthusiastically and intentionally duped by some very rich, very impotent white males three years running and it's damn near time for a domestic regime change and let's just float a Dean/Kerry (Kerry/Dean?) presidential ticket out there to the cosmic Void, see how it plays, shall we?

Because after all, that whimpering house of cards, it can't survive much longer.

©2003 SF Gate



To: American Spirit who wrote (3624)7/27/2003 2:31:04 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 10965
 
Many of us continue to believe that CONgress failed to have an effective debate last year on the wisdom of pre-emptively striking Iraq...

Message 19151440



To: American Spirit who wrote (3624)7/28/2003 10:53:56 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
Message 19156001



To: American Spirit who wrote (3624)8/3/2003 5:38:12 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 10965
 
Bush's Vietnam-sized Credibility Gap
___________________________

By Helen Thomas
Syndicated Columnist
Tuesday 29 July 2003

WASHINGTON -- President Bush has a huge credibility gap stemming from his exaggerated rhetoric that led the United States to attack Iraq.

The Bush hype recalls the Lyndon B. Johnson era when LBJ's misleading statements and deceptions led us deeper into the disastrous Vietnam War.

Johnson later acknowledged that public mistrust had doomed his chances for re-election in 1968. Trust and truth still go a long way with the American people when it comes to war and peace.

To rally public support for an unprovoked U.S. invasion of Iraq, Bush laid it on with a shovel. There were scary warnings of an imminent, direct threat that Saddam Hussein would use nuclear, biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction against us.

Throughout the buildup for war, Bush and his aides repeatedly claimed that there was a link between Iraq and the al-Qaida terrorists.

So far, after almost four months of U.S. occupation of Iraq, none of those contentions has panned out.

The Iraqis deployed none of those feared weapons when U.S. forces invaded on March 20, despite warnings that had led many U.S. military men and women to spend uncomfortable hours decked out in protective moon suits.

Likewise, the occupation has failed to turn up evidence of a link between Saddam and al-Qaida.

This hasn't stopped the White House message machine. White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters again last week that the weapons will be discovered and that they were a "grave threat" to the United States and the rest of the world.

The administration should learn that mere repetition of a claim doesn't make it true.

As late as March 16, Vice President Dick Cheney said on NBC-TV's "Meet the Press" that "we believe (Saddam Hussein) has reconstituted nuclear weapons."

Now we're trying to sort out the welter of mea culpas from administration officials about who was responsible for the bogus uranium report in the president's State of the Union address. That speech contained the famous 16 words: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." It turned out that this segment was based on a crude forgery.

When the details of this flub started tumbling out, Condoleezza Rice, Bush's national security adviser, blamed the CIA. This led CIA director George Tenet to take the blame with a deep public grovel.

Later, Tenet apparently nudged the White House to reveal it had received two CIA memos last October and a warning again in January, all cautioning that the uranium report was dubious.

This time, Rice's assistant, Stephen Hadley, stepped forward to accept blame for not deleting the erroneous sentence from the address.

A defensive White House seems eager to change the subject. McClellan insists that the Iraqi invasion "should be seen through the prism of the war on terrorism."

Cheney said Thursday that failure to act would have been "irresponsible in the extreme" and would have endangered the United States.

In a Rose Garden speech last week, Bush pointed to the big picture, saying "a free, democratic, peaceful Iraq will not threaten America or our friends with illegal weapons" and "will not be a training ground for terrorists...."

After a five-day tour of Iraq, deputy defense secretary Paul Wolfowitz, a super hawk, came home last week and dismissed questions about the missing weapons, saying it was a question for the intelligence agencies. "I am not concerned about weapons of mass destruction," he said. "I am concerned about getting Iraq on its feet."

Sorry, Wolfowitz, you can't have it both ways. You were an architect in the trumped-up strategy that deceived the American people, causing them to believe the weapons endangered their lives. On those fears, we went to war.

The term "credibility gap" was coined in the Johnson era and popularized by Washington Post reporter Murray Marder. It symbolized the contrast between LBJ's rosy statements about the cost and progress of the war, with the more realistic news dispatches from Vietnam.

Although the Bush administration credibility gap looks more like the Grand Canyon, don't expect the president to take the responsibility for any false claims.

The week before last, he dodged the question on whether he would assume responsibility for the misleading allegations. In response, he continued to insist Iraq had sought a nuclear weapons program. "I take responsibility for dealing with that threat," he said sternly.

-------

Helen Thomas is a columnist for Hearst Newspapers.

truthout.org



To: American Spirit who wrote (3624)8/7/2003 6:42:40 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 10965
 
The Terminator running for Gov. of CA...lol...

Yet, I think special attention should be paid to the fact that the Lt. Governor Cruz Bustamonte has filed.

story.news.yahoo.com

This breaks the Democrats "United Front", and gives those voters who are predisposed to voting Democratic an option other than Governor Davis...The Hispanic vote in CA is huge and it should NOT be underestimated.

Bustamonte must truly have hated his boss to pull this.

Davis is toast.

Of course, this is JMO.

-s2



To: American Spirit who wrote (3624)8/7/2003 11:21:31 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 10965
 
Message 19187369