Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (107747)	7/24/2003 2:50:30 PM
From: Lou Weed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

<<It's not the least "appalling" to blame Saddam for the WTC>> Wow.....so it's fine to blame him for something he didn't do. Must be fine for the Germans to blame us then! This is starting to get ridiculous.....I'll give you the last word.... MON

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (107747)	7/24/2003 3:04:36 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<<"It's not the least "appalling" to blame Saddam for the WTC.">> Appalling? I would say "ridiculous" or "absrud" come closer to the mark.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (107747)	7/26/2003 1:43:57 AM
From: Graystone	Respond to of 281500

<<small potatoes>> or brutal suppression of Iraq Do you think that Saddam did things which made the the September 11th tragedy, in your words <<small potatoes>> ? Do you think Saddam did these things before or after the September 11 tragedy ? Is your assertion that others should view the September 11th attacks as <<small potatoes>> when compared to <<any number of things>> things that Saddam did ? I always thought Emile had his approach backwards. His strong pro-Palestinian rhetoric often caused pro-Israeli comments and discussion, to cause people to argue for the Palestinians he should have taken an pro-Israeli stance, a very extreme one would force others to argue the Palestinian cause.