Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (3627)	7/24/2003 6:49:59 PM
From: Glenn Petersen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10965

Ray, Actually, the full quote from the Quinnipiac site was, the poll was selected a "winner" by the New York Post for the most accurate prediction on the Schumer-D'Amato Senate race in 1998... I do pay attention to the origin of the various polls, though not quite as closely at this point in the election cycle. I can't quite shake the vision that the interns take over the polling responsibilities in the summer preceding a national election. Haul in a couple of kegs and hit the phones. Not many people are focused on the Democratic race, which probably accounts for Lieberman's performance. However, I do think that the Hillary Clinton number is significant. The independent polls generally provide greater depth. I have found Zogby to be fairly reliable at the national level. It would be interesting to have access to the internal DNC and RNC poll results. I have a bookmark on another computer that may interest you. It tracks the historical results for the GWB Approve-Disapprove question for 12 or 15 different polls. I'll post it later if you promise not to misuse it.