SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave O. who wrote (2277)7/24/2003 10:21:39 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3143
 
Or better yet, he could have done his own homework and not paid anyone anything.

When a site has 500-1,000 traders issuing recs all day long, not joining would be like trading the markets without reading the newspaper, watching CNBC, or paying any attention to Wall Street upgrades and downgrades - flying completely blind. And that was another reason why the brokers and advisers said you had to be at a site or you could get nailed. Glad you raised that point.



To: Dave O. who wrote (2277)7/25/2003 8:45:54 PM
From: Yogizuna  Respond to of 3143
 
Plenty of people have paid advisors "tons of money" even when their advice started turning sour...
The rest of your argument is all personal opinion, and does not touch on the reality of the pending cases IMO. Who cares how smart it was or was not? You are trying to judge the Count personally, and ignore most of the facts presented in this case so far...


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News