Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (172544)	7/25/2003 11:16:29 AM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572408

tejek, re:What does that have to do with anything? Why are you annoyed with me? I'm not annoyed with you, just wondering how you can dismiss information that leads one to conclude Iraq had a weapons program and either had or planned to make more WMD. Perhaps when they saw us coming they either hid things really well or simply disposed of them - time will tell, not this political snipping. As for the 16 words thingy, the president did say the brits claim, and they still do. Sort of a non-starter issue. re:However, asking if I bury centrifuges in my backyard is basic BS and does nothing to move the argument forward. Not true, the only argument you are moving forward is trying to discredit Bush. The mountains of evidence regarding Iraqi WMD count for nothing against a smear campaign. The media should spend more time pressing for this supposed 7 mile high collection of documents. I want to see our efforts to find things re-doubled now that a potential reason to continue concealing information has been removed (Saddam's sons). Getting excited over a SOTU address stating a fact that the Brits think Iraq tried to buy Uranium is not an issue. The problem as I see it is all that WMD crap is still there, somewhere - perhaps buried in another flower garden.