SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : A to Z Junior Mining Research Site -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (5179)7/25/2003 5:15:25 AM
From: jrhana  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5423
 
Because I found your post offensive and hypocritical
and she did not post it



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (5179)7/25/2003 5:25:28 AM
From: TheBusDriver  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 5423
 
I probably should not wade into this, but holding back is not one of my strong points. I am only posting to you because you were at the top of the heap. The fact that he/she, whoever, posts the same post on several threads really does not bother me at all.

I read some of these posts last night and then noticed that Jim Willie CB, whom I consider a much greater contributor to investor knowledge than myself, posted the same post here and on other threads I read.

So what? Well I think the comment from Howy is what is important:

"He's presumably the promo person for the company, judging by the name and his posting history. Now *that* I don't like!"

I totally agree with Howy. I was "had" by a person doing this, I think Howy saw through him but I didn't. We both were in the stock this guy was doing the pump and dump on. And this guy was a master at it. To be paid to promote a stock without revealing this fact is the issue here not the fact that spam has happen, don't you think?

I don't care how many threads you post the same or similar message on really, however I do care if you are being paid to do it, I care about that *A LOT*.

Wayne