SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (107971)7/25/2003 9:22:18 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
It would be preferable for us to decided on a set of rules and follow them. Either we show bodies, or we don't show bodies- but let's make sure it's not a war crime (and if we're going to call it one, let's make sure we don't do it). It's more than photos- it's about desecration of the dead. I read the Geneva convention last night. It's not specific about photos of the dead, but we sure were when pictures of our guys were shown.......

You can minimize it and call it tasteless photos (I wonder why the government didn't say that when it was US guys? Was that what YOU were saying then?)- but the battle for the peace of Iraq will depend in large part on the Iraqi perception of the US (and the perception of the rest of the world.) I think this might hurt us much more than it helps us. But of course, make it about "tasteless photos".



To: Neocon who wrote (107971)7/25/2003 9:25:20 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
No one's head was on a pike,

I read that Dan Rather had the vapors about showing the photos. We put out movies that are so violent that we won't let our kids see them, but act Victorian about dead people on TV. Meanwhile, they go to beheadings with the kids and snacks in the Mid-East. What nonsense!