SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (172568)7/25/2003 12:29:03 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574006
 
The Juanita Broaderrick rape was supported by no fewer than six witnesses who were contemporaneously aware of the event, some of whom witnessed the victim's injury that came from his biting her lip.

You are saying that six people watched Clinton rape Broaderrick. If you are not saying this, then they were not witnesses.



To: i-node who wrote (172568)7/25/2003 12:44:13 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574006
 
Broaderrick has recanted her story a couple of times. You yourself have said that Clinton has used his position and his charisma to attract women. In fact, women have a tendency to fall all over him. You just posted to Tim that you think Bryant is being framed. However you have no trouble finding Clinton guilty as Juanita claims. What part of your position looks suspiciously like a very partisan Rep. with an axe to grind?

As I've told you before, rape is a crime of power. Rapists tend to be people who are filled with anger and violence, and usually reside outside of society's mainstream. Clinton, much like Bryant, does not fit that profile. Anyone without an axe to grind can see that.

And btw, you really need to get more objective about your views. You make yourself look foolish. Just a heads up!

*******************************************************

slate.msn.com

Juanita Broderick, named in the Paula Jones suit only as "Jane Doe No. 5." This is the most controversial and damning of the allegations. Paula Jones' lawyers contend that Clinton violently forced himself on Broderick 20 years ago, when he was attorney general of Arkansas and she was a campaign worker, and then bribed and intimidated her into silence. Broderick's friends, who were interviewed by the Jones lawyers and the media, claim to have heard the story first hand. But last winter Broderick signed an affidavit denying that Clinton made any sexual advances towards her. Then, a few months later, she told the Office of the Independent Counsel that the affidavit was false. Like Monica Lewinsky, Broderick was granted immunity from prosecution by Starr.