SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dave O. who wrote (2332)7/25/2003 1:38:12 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3143
 
Oliver Velez is one of the greatest frauds in all of trading, and so is Pristine and the Executioner. You defend them and to me that says it all.

You defend someone calling his own clients "naive idiots"? That merely demonstrates your character. You think it is anything but completely delusional and sociopathic to say "Take food off my table" - AS IF THE MARKETS BELONG TO HIM ALONE, HOW DARE ANYONE THINK TO INTERFERE.

Like I said, these people think they are the masters of the universe. They're in for a rude surprise.



To: Dave O. who wrote (2332)7/25/2003 1:40:18 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3143
 
You ask about 25 questions in a post I'm not going to bother - especially when you don't ask questions but you give answers first, then ask questions. You want to ask a question, if I think it's appropriate to answer here and now then maybe I will. Likely, I will answer, as I have answered the majority of questions asked here.



To: Dave O. who wrote (2332)7/25/2003 1:52:11 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3143
 
You ask lots of questions. If we're going to debate here, then I think it is time you answered some yourself. Let's see if you do. You read this post:

Message 19143102

Now please explain to me how these are not recommendations on securities to buy and sell. Thank-you.



To: Dave O. who wrote (2332)7/25/2003 1:54:06 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3143
 
Please explain to me if you think it is not a violation of various security laws, NASD and SEC regulations, not to mention state and federal statutes, to operate an advisory service and a brokerage firm at the same time, and to deny that the two are affiliated, in fact for all intents and purposes the alter ego of one another?

Please provide you reasoning. It would support your theories if you provided some actual law that might be on point. Thank-you.



To: Dave O. who wrote (2332)7/25/2003 9:51:59 PM
From: Yogizuna  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3143
 
It's nice to see you admire a guy who takes from his wife's retirement account to speculate in the market...