Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (2343)	7/25/2003 2:14:40 PM
From: Dave O.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3143

< If they were "suggestions," then why did Rea claim 94% accuracy? > I have no affiliation with Rea and never have done business with them. But ... I'd bet they have data to show they did have 94% accuracy at some point in time. How do you think mutual funds sell themselves? They post statistics that take periods when they did well ... it may not be 5 years of returns; it may be 14 months or whatever makes them look good. And as you know ... past performance is not guaranteed in the future. As far as what you state are recommendations ... I believe I saw the words "Always Use Protective Stops" time after time. Personally I don't really care if they are "recommendations" or "suggestions" ... each trader needs to be responsible for his/her own entry/exit.