Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (19921)	7/25/2003 3:57:30 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 21614

re: I think I understand, a product of homeschooling? I am no expert in that field, true, but I do have common sense re: The gas needs to be compressed so that it will inflate the balloons that are used to check the wind direction. why does it need to be compressed if your production facilities are right there next to you re: It also allows a reasonable amount to be stored in the cylinders so that the making of the gas does not have to go on continuously (after all, the main object is to lob artillary shells, not to be making party balloons). you mean like storing the compressed gas rather than producing it all the time? Why do you need a mobile production facilities again? re: no motors are required, no compressors, no sparks, no recreations of the Hindenburg landing. Hindenburg? Is that that big thing than blew up on TV just last night? I wonder why transmission of that news was in B&W..... <ggg> But, anyhow, let me understand it correctly - you have an artillery unit with protected shells and right next to them you have a big unprotected hydrogen production device with code name Hindenburg - sounds like a great design to me <gggggg> BTW does US or Russia use that type of approach too? I do not think I am going to be joining artllery if the anser is yes.... :-)) or no, come to think of it