SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (172645)7/31/2003 4:05:37 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573691
 
No it isn't. If the American companies get the contract after actual open bidding there is nothing wrong with it.

To date, the bidding has not been open


To date there hasn't been much bidding. Most of the work is not contracted for yet.

"If American companies get some super favorable contract that allows them to take most of the profit from Iraqi oil for themselves then it might legitimately be considered "a form of stealing", but that hasn't happened and there is no evidence to suggest that it will."

Its pretty early but so far that's the way it looks.


It does?!?

Good answer........you should work for Cheney. Cheney is the VP of the US, not Iraq

So he isn't allowed to research Iraq??

Unfortunately, I have to think there might be something sinister because of the bad rep the oil industry has in general........let's not forget Enron.

Enron wasn't really part of the oil industry. Besides every major industry has had dishonest companies and individuals, that doesn't mean that anyone who is or has ever been connected to those industries are themselves dishonest or sinister.

If its not sinister or Machiavellian, why the secrets?

Some people are just secretive by nature. Others might have something embarrassing they want to cover up but not something sinister or machiavellian. Add those two together and I'm pretty sure you have a larger percentage of secretive people then the percentage that is sinister and machiavellian.

You don't think granting Halliburton, his former company, an exclusive, non open bidded contract with an upside limit of $7 billion isn't a bit suspicious?

No, in the context of all the known facts about this contract.

Tim