SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (3847)7/27/2003 1:33:18 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793575
 
I didn't use "emotional terms" to describe arguments, I just quoted you back to yourself. Saying that Ashcroft is hated by a wide section of the political spectrum is simply descriptive. Aren't you using "emotional" terms when you say that there's more evidence that Bush is a fascist than that he should go to Rushmore? (btw, what evidence, please? you still haven't produced a single piece of evidence).

But somehow, if I say Ashcroft is widely hated, that's emotional terms. If you say Bush is more a fascist than a great President, that's not emotional terms, oh no.

Sauce for the goose is never sauce for the gander with you.



To: JohnM who wrote (3847)7/27/2003 4:23:29 PM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793575
 
As for whether Bush is a fascist or his administration is fascist or not, it's definitely too early to tell. There is certainly more evidence pointing in that direction than away from it.

John,
That is 100% pure rubbish.
You are baiting.

But you are entitled to say it and this is the one country where, thanks to men willing to fight to preserve your freedoms, you can make such an outrageous statement without fear.
uw


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News