SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (108441)7/27/2003 10:08:38 PM
From: KyrosL  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
So you think that foreign intervention is not right in some civil wars.

Would you have supported intervention in the Iraq civil war that followed Gulf War I, when the Shiites and marsh Arabs revolted and Saddam savagely suppressed them?



To: GST who wrote (108441)7/28/2003 12:31:14 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
In calling it a civil war, you are acknowledging that it was not a war for freedom from foreign domination. They achieved that when the French left. Yet you still persist in double talk about "they are now free from foreign domination" and so on.

I guess it's easy to adopt the viewpoint of one's clients.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News