SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: StockDung who wrote (84920)7/28/2003 11:41:56 AM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
Busy fellow, presumably even when he was a serving police officer...

Corporation
DON GEORGINO ENTERPRISES
Number: C0857913 Date Filed: 12/27/1977 Status: suspended
Jurisdiction: California
Mailing Address
227 W FAIRVIEW AVE
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776
Agent for Service of Process
DON GEORGINO
227 W FAIRVIEW AVE
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776

Corporation
GEORGINO & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Number: C0868262 Date Filed: 6/26/1978 Status: suspended
Jurisdiction: California
Mailing Address
227 W FAIRVIEW AVE
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776
Agent for Service of Process
DON GEORGINO
227 W FAIRVIEW AVE
SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776



To: StockDung who wrote (84920)7/28/2003 11:59:58 AM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
Disclaimer: This web site and the information contained herein is being provided as a non-profit public service. The entire page has been created, developed, updated, maintained and published by Asiavest-China, located in the Peoples Republic of China.

Asiavest-China is an independent entity and is not legally affiliated with Asiavest-USA or Asiavest-Asia Pacific, with reference to the publication of this web site. This site has been independently produced. Should the reader of this page have any comments, suggestions, corrections, criticisms, or issues with any type of alleged infringement, contact Asiavest-China directly at:

asiavest_china@yahoo.com

angelfire.com

CORRUPTION IN MODERN JOURNALISM
BY PHILLIP WU
MAY 18, 2003
TAIPEI

Recently reported news that a reporter for the New York Times has been accused of plagiarism and of fabricating articles, may be the sign of an even more serious situation in professional journalism.

We have reported on several occasions that a certain small cap reporter/writer for a major financial news service had been suspect in writing articles for personal financial gain. We also believe that this certain reporter may have played a key role in a major criminal enterprise involving naked shorting and government corruption. Our suspicions have been passed on to a variety of enforcement agencies, all of which have assured us that an investigation would be conducted. Rumors have it that those investigations were in fact initiated and are currently ongoing. From the interviews that we have conducted and the evidence we have gathered, it is our belief/opinion that the allegations are true. We also believe that the truth will eventually surface, as it has, in the New York Times incident. We are documenting this report on our web site because we truly believe that the allegations are true, and that this certain journalist’s employer has continued to ignore the warning signs, the complaints, and even the numerous lawsuits. It is our opinion that this certain journalist has for over a period of at least three years engaged in an ongoing pattern of corruption and criminal activity. We believe that there are documented financial transactions(both in the United States and offshore), computer evidence and a very clear paper trail, that will eventually expose this public corruption. Our investigation alone has generated more than 1000 pages of investigative notes and reports in an attempt to expose this crime. It is a crime which has affected more than fifty public companies, many of which were so devastated by the misleading and manipulative stories that their stock prices crashed with each story and with each update of a story. This “hatchet job” form of journalism has caused literally thousands of investors to lose millions upon millions of their hard earned dollars.

If we cannot trust the media to provide fair and balanced reporting, then who can we trust to inform us of current events and news in general? Just look at the scandal currently affecting the New York Times, one of the leading news providers in the world. Just imagine what will happen if it is determined that a certain financial news provider is itself infected with a virus of corrupt journalist(s). It would be more than a public scandal; it could be a financial disaster, and put in question all other providers of financial information. The primary person to be held accountable should be the one at the very top of the organizational chart of the suspect organization. Also to be held liable and publicly accountable should be any governmental agency that failed to take immediate action to protect investors and the public welfare in general.

NOTE: This report was written by investigators in the Taipei office of Asiavest Investigative Services. The information in this report is based on research, witness interviews, field investigations and the personal opinions of investigators. Additional and relevant information may be found on this web site in previously written exclusive reports and general media releases. Permission to copy or reprint this investigative report, must be obtained from the administrative offices of Asiavest Investigative Services.

Copyright 2003 Asiavest Investigative Services. All Rights Reserved.



To: StockDung who wrote (84920)7/28/2003 12:09:00 PM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
This report has been prepared by Asiavest Investigative Services as a reference document

CORPORATIONS BEWARE

ANTI-SLAPP LAWS vs. AGGRESSIVE CORPORATE ENTITIES

March 28, 2003

Many public companies are often times eager to quiet on line critics and to identify anonymous message board posters. Filing lawsuits and issuing subpoenas to identify on line critics will often accomplish their initial goal, but those actions can very well have negative results. This aggressive type action can often times be an ill-advised approach, especially in the State of California.

In California, there is a law called "Anti-SLAPP" which basically says that if you file a frivolous lawsuit against an entity to "shut them up," a hearing will be held within sixty days to determine if a "SLAPP" situation exists. If it does, The case is instantly DISMISSED, and the Plaintiff (whoever filed the lawsuit) is generally ordered to immediately pay the Defendant's attorney fees. "SLAPP" is an acronym for "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation."

Under California law, the person bringing the anti-SLAPP motion [the person who is the Defendant in a SLAPP suit] must file a motion with the Court which, in addition to meeting all usual legal requirements for motions, shows that the lawsuit is one which comes within the scope of the anti-SLAPP law, that is, that he or she was sued for exercising the constitutional right of free speech or the right to petition government.

Once the moving party has shown that this is so, and thus that the anti-SLAPP law applies, then a very heavy burden is imposed upon the person who filed the SLAPP suit [the SLAPP Plaintiff].

In brief, the SLAPP Plaintiff must show that he or she has a "probability of prevailing" on the claims asserted. This can be done only by producing, in opposition to the anti-SLAPP motion, admissible evidence which, if believed by the jury, would be enough to support a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff.

The requirement that the evidence be admissible is a very important one. It is often very difficult for a Plaintiff to produce, so early in the case, evidence which is legally "admissible" under the rules of evidence. Also, it is often difficult for a Plaintiff to produce, so early in the case, evidence on every single point which would be necessary to support a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff.

This burden of proving the Plaintiff's case by "admissible" evidence is especially heavy because once an anti-SLAPP motion is filed, all "discovery" [such as depositions] is stopped, unless and until special permission is obtained from the Judge permitting discovery to continue.

In addition to producing evidence to support the claims made against you, the SLAPP Plaintiff must also overcome your constitutional and related affirmative defenses.

Thus, as a practical matter, the SLAPP Plaintiff will have difficulty making the necessary showing unless he or she had all of the necessary evidence before filing the lawsuit. Usually, Plaintiffs do not have all of the evidence they need before filing the lawsuit.

Anti-SLAPP laws -- designed to help defendants defeat "strategic lawsuits against public participation" -- are now being invoked in cases involving statements made in cyberspace. In one case, a California court applied an anti-SLAPP law in a dispute over allegedly defamatory comments posted in a web site.

In California, a defendant in a SLAPP lawsuit may bring a "Special Motion to Strike," and show that the actions complained of are in furtherance of his right of free speech. Specifically, this may be established by showing that the statement forming the basis of the defamation suit was made in "a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest"(such as a public internet message board such as Yahoo).

The California anti-SLAPP law was passed to address what was perceived to be a disturbing increase in lawsuits brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional right of freedom of speech. The anti-SLAPP law is a procedural device that is designed to secure the prompt dismissal of SLAPP lawsuits unless the complaining parties can meet the stringent criteria under the anti-SLAPP law. As this case shows, this can present a formidable hurdle to claims of libel and slander.

The plaintiffs in the California case, Barrett v. Clark, filed a lawsuit, which was determined by the court to be a SLAPP suit, against several individuals who were alleged to have defamed the plaintiffs. However, the protections afforded to the defendants by the anti-SLAPP law, and by the immunity provisions of the CDA, proved to be insurmountable obstacles to the defamation claims. Thus, the defendant's Internet-based speech was essentially shielded by the combination of the First Amendment and California's anti-SLAPP law.

As if the defeat for the plaintiffs were not complete enough, the court also noted that in any event the plaintiffs were to be treated as "public figures" in the context of the dispute, and that under federal constitutional principles, they could not recover in the absence of a showing of "actual malice" by the defendants -- that is, by a showing that the defendants knew the statements to be false. Honest belief, in short, was a complete defense to the defamation claims, even if the statements had been determined to be both false and defamatory.

The Barrett case succinctly illustrates many important principles in the developing law of Internet free speech. Other courts faced with similar issues will no doubt emulate Judge James Richman's clear and cogent reasoning and methodical approach.

Often times internet posters faced with a threat of legal action have formally and publicly indicated that they are exercising their rights of free speech and certain rights afforded by anti-SLAPP laws. This in itself has been sufficient to stay any action anticipated by potential plaintiffs.

There are numerous non-profit organizations to be found on the Internet, which will assist SLAPP defendants in exercising their rights afforded under anti-SLAPP laws.

This report has been prepared by Asiavest Investigative Services as a reference document.

angelfire.com



To: StockDung who wrote (84920)7/28/2003 12:15:40 PM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
One company that we have watched closely was a company called Genisesintermedia (GENI), which we consider an absolute textbook classic act of stock manipulation.

THE PUMP AND DUMP SCHEME
AN EXCLUSIVE REPORT BY ASIAVEST INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES

This web site has provided a great deal of information on shorting and the short and distort scheme, but there is another side to the coin, that we have not covered and that is the pump and dump scheme. In many respects, the pump and dump scheme can have an even more devastating effect on investors, than can the short and distort scheme. From this writer’s perspective, investors can see the short attack coming, but the pump and dump tends to take investors by surprise. For as many short attacks as there are, there are just as many pump and dumps. The vast majority of these fraudulent schemes seem to fly under the radar screens of the SEC and other governmental regulatory agencies.

Just what is a pump and dump? The common pump and dump is to take a stock and thru a variety of fraudulent actions, manipulate the price of the stock to an inflated value. Once the price has reached its maximum potential, it is then sold off in large blocks. Once this happens the price of the stock immediately drops by double-digit percentages leaving innocent stockholders with dramatic losses. Generally there are two types of pump and dump schemes, the immediate and the long term. The immediate occurs when someone releases false information, generally thru a media release, with the specific intent of manipulating the price. This could be the company itself, or an outsider. The specific intent is to stimulate interest in the stock, attract buying, and cause the price to rise. Scenario, the fraudster buys a stock at lets say $5.00 a share, he/she then releases some false information like the company has just signed a multi-million dollar contract, buyers start buying, the price climbs maybe 60% to 80% within hours, the fraudster sells, and the price drops to even lower than where it started. This type of manipulation will almost immediately attract the attention of regulators but often times, after it is too late. The company itself rarely orchestrates this type of pump and dump.

The long term pump and dump is generally a company-orchestrated manipulation, which will often result in a class action lawsuit and eventual regulator intervention. The scenario is an intentional manipulation of the corporate stock over a period of time, which could be anywhere from three months to as long as two years. The company releasing profit projections, which reveal an untrue projection of upcoming quarterly revenues, could initiate a short-term pump and dump. Glowing revenue projections attract new buyers and the stock price goes up. As the price of the stock increases, insiders sell, reaping inflated profits. After two months, the company will issue adjusted revenue projections reflecting “canceled orders and a weaker than expected economy”. We recently investigated a case that followed this exact same pattern. The stock was trading at $5.15 per share and after the inflated revenue projections were released, the stock rose to $22.00 per share in a matter of a month. Insiders sold off 150 million dollars of stock at between $18. and $21. before restating their earning projections and watching the stock fall over a period of days to $4.85. During the unrealistic highs, every company Director sold off stock, and there was absolutely no attention given by regulators. Fortunately for innocent investors, a class action lawsuit was initiated and eventually this will attract the attention of the SEC.

One company that we have watched closely was a company called Genisesintermedia (GENI), which we consider an absolute textbook classic act of stock manipulation. GENI was not only a perfectly executed pump and dump scheme it was also the target of a professional organization of illegal short sellers. GENI was such a well-coordinated scheme that even most company employees were unaware that their company stock was being manipulated. The manipulation of GENI stock involved everything from paying off stock analysts to alleged bribes to well know media analysts who recommended the purchase of the stock numerous times on financial news programs. They had everything going for them including television and the print media. The stock price rose to $27 and was split three for one. After the split, the stock rose again to over $20 and was preparing for another three for one split, when the scheme collapsed. The manipulation of GENI involved corporate insiders, brokers, market makers, media personalities, bankers, off shore entities, and even an international arms dealer. It took the SEC over one year to finally take action. When they did take action, there was a trading halt. When the stock began trading, it was trading in pennies within a matter of days. The manipulation of GENI resulted in multi million dollar losses to brokers and investors. It also caused the failure of a major brokerage house and tainted a European traditional bank with scandal. It also resulted in millions of dollars in profits for the manipulators and for the short sellers. At the time of this writing, GENI was trading in the pink sheets at .0001 per share. Its corporate officers had turned their efforts to new corporate entities, the SEC was investigating and a major class action lawsuit had been filed.

The question with GENI is, why was the scheme allowed to continue for as long as it did? Why was the SEC reluctant to step in and protect investors, even though they had been alerted months in advance of the obvious scheme and criminal activity? Were government officials corrupted? Members of the media certainly were. Members of the Wall Street community certainly were. Why were no criminal indictments handed down? Why are the perpetrators of this criminal enterprise allowed to involve themselves with other publicly traded companies? Why were the ill-gotten gains of this criminal enterprise not repatriated from off shore bank accounts in Bermuda and the Cayman Islands? These are questions that every investor should be concerned about. The Enron scandal is considered kids play in comparison to the daily frauds committed in the world of public companies. Enron, in our opinion was not even close to the daily occurring criminal manipulation of public companies.

The next time you see a company making claims that appear unrealistic or if you go to a public message board and see postings such as, “NEW CONTRACTS BEING SIGNED”, THIS STOCK IS GOING TO GO THROUGH THE ROOF” or you look at a .10 stock and see analysts saying $5.00 in three months, be very cautious and consider that type of information as nothing more than a red flag. Be wary of hipsters and touts. There are no free lunches, and often times, what you see is not what it seems. Investment decisions should be based on company fundamentals and independent in-depth due diligence.


Disclaimer: Asiavest investigators who specialize in securities fraud wrote this article. The article is intended to give investors an insight into the possible pitfalls of investing. It has been written so that a layman can understand it. The information contained in the report is considered reliable although there are no explicit or implied warrantees as to the specific accuracy of the information. Much of the information was garnered from media reports and investigative resources. The information contained in this report is proprietary information and as such is protected by copyright laws. This report cannot be reproduced or retransmitted in anyway without the written permission of Asiavest investigative Services-Securities Fraud Division. Asiavest is one of a select group of companies specializing in securities fraud and plaintiff litigation support

angelfire.com



To: StockDung who wrote (84920)7/28/2003 12:20:50 PM
From: scion  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
If you are a public company that has been a victim of what you perceive to be manipulation by the media, feel free to send us your documentation so we can include it in our investigative data base.

STOCK MANIPULATION AND THE MEDIA

EXCLUSIVE INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
The following is an assessment based on personal opinion and observations, expression of which are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, three years of specialized investigation, and information obtained from public records and sources.

Does the media play a role in manipulating stock prices? The answer of course would be yes, although the key point is, do they do it intentionally? As to the key point and in our own personal opinion, we would answer, of course. We base our opinion on the past three years of a complex investigation and extensive research. Do some research for yourself and take a look at what happened to a company called Genesisintermedia (OTCBB: GENI).

GENI is alleged to have paid off stock touts and analysts to promote their company in various forms of the media. This included giving a T.V. commentator several million dollars worth of stock to promote the company through the television medium, and by providing stock in their(GENI) company to a certain stock analyst.

The following information was taken from public records and class action lawsuits that have been filed against GENI:

The fraudulent scheme succeeded in driving up the price of Genesis stock 50% in December, 1999 as the public began reading glowing reports regarding Genesis issued by the analysts.

Similarly on February 8, 2000, Bloomberg TV announced that Genesis stock was expected to increase between 300% and 500%. Following that announcement, the price of Genesis Stock sharply increased nearly 80% from $2.21 to $3.92.

On February 25, 2000, CNBC announced that Genesis was a "Double your money pick." Following that announcement, the price of Genesis stock again increased nearly 80% from $5.48 to $9.33.

By February, 2000, as more false positive reports were disseminated to the public, Genesis stock soared nearly 80% on high volume trading. By March, 2000, the price of Genesis stock had risen more than 700% above the price the stock had traded at just months earlier.

On September 25, 2001, NASDAQ stunned investors by announcing that it was halting trading of GENI and issued the following press release:

The Nasdaq Stock Market(SM) announced that trading was halted in GenesisIntermedia, Inc.(GENI), today at 4:55 p.m., Eastern Time, for "additional information requested" from the company at a last price of 5.90. Trading will remain halted until GenesisIntermedia, Inc. has fully satisfied Nasdaq's request for additional information.

GENI subsequently began trading again and at the time of this writing, was trading on the pink sheets at .0001 per share, but there is a lot more to the story.

In early 2001, GENI was heavily shorted by what appears to be a group of organized shorter sellers. It is believed that the short interest began posting negative information on public message boards to drive the price down, but instead of dropping, the price continued to surge upwards. Then, a reporter for a major financial news service started to write a series of negative articles on the company. The articles accomplished almost immediately what the short sellers could not independently accomplish. Subsequently trading in the stock was halted and once it resumed trading, it was all but worthless. This is a text book example of how the media can push a stock upwards and on the other side of the coin, bring it down.

What happened to GENI is not uncommon, but is often a situation that goes unnoticed. One must always wonder what the motivation is of journalists who write slanted articles, either positive or negative. Are they reporting news or do they have other motivations or interests? Whatever the answer is, it is obvious that the media can have a direct influence on the value of publicly traded companies. It is also very obvious that the media can be influenced and corrupted.

Another company that has been directly affected by the media is a company called Wade Cook Financial (WADE). This is a company that has been relentlessly attacked by a certain journalist of a certain media organization. Their (WADE) stock price has plummeted in what many believe is a result of the numerous negative articles written about the company. Is it just a coincidence that the company had been heavily shorted over the course of the publication of the negative articles? What better way to bring down the price of a publicly traded company than to have "credible" media write negative articles about a company. Some observers have referred to the articles written about WADE as pure hatchet jobs. But, it is not only GENI and WADE that have been affected by the media, there are numerous companies that have experienced similar manipulation through organized "hatchet jobs". Most have bitten the bullet and others have fought back with litigation. At least one company had litigation pending in the appeals court, against one of the major financial news organizations, at the time of this writing.

Honest reporting of the news is an essential element of transparency, although, intentionally slanted reporting can be devastating to a public company. Our investigations have shown over the past several years that there exists a clear pattern of questionable activity by certain members of the media and these patterns of questionable activity have had a very negative effect on a number of publicly traded companies. In some of these isolated cases there appears to exist a direct link between certain "investigative" journalists and organized criminal activity; especially in the area of short selling.

Over the past year, we have received reports that certain journalists have been compensated by traders to write negative articles on companies. In fact we were told by a certain CEO, that he had been told that a certain "investigative" reporter had been paid $50,000 to write a negative article about his company, and the money was wired to the reporters bank account the day after the article was published. We have also obtained information that certain financial reporters had written articles and at the same time had maintained their own trading accounts, in more than one brokerage house. If this is in fact true(and we believe it to be), at the very least it would be unethical and at the very most it would be outright criminal. We have also interviewed "experts" that have been quoted in various slanted articles and they have clearly indicated that they had been misquoted by certain "investigative" reporters.

Does a conspiracy exist between stock manipulators and certain members of the media? In our opinion, most likely, yes.

The key point here is to not believe everything you read or hear in the media. Do your own due diligence and check out the facts for yourself.

If you are a public company that has been a victim of what you perceive to be manipulation by the media, feel free to send us your documentation so we can include it in our investigative data base.

angelfire.com



To: StockDung who wrote (84920)7/28/2003 12:25:28 PM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
Almost all of the articles, in many cases, were written by the same journalist. This is not coincidence; it is part of an ongoing pattern of what we believe to be, criminal activity.

The above report was prepared and published by Asiavest-China and translated to English from the original Chinese report.

STOCK MANIPULATION AND THE MEDIA (UPDATE 1)

EXCLUSIVE INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
Since writing our first report, we have been contacted by numerous publicly traded companies that have fallen victim to what they believe to be media manipulation. In almost all cases there has been a common link to extensive short trading of their stock and the timed release of certain negative news articles by certain specific journalists. Almost all of the articles, in many cases, were written by the same journalist. This is not coincidence; it is part of an ongoing pattern of what we believe to be, criminal activity. The effects of this pattern of activity are not only directed at Bulletin Board stocks, but have also effected stocks traded on AMEX and NASDAQ.

One need only to look at certain stocks and the pattern is obvious. Many of the companies targeted by the short interest have been halted and in many cases, gone out of business. Were those companies scams that deserved to be run out of business, or were they simply victims of organized criminal activity? There is differing opinion, based on who you ask. We believe that in many cases, the companies had weak fundamentals and naive management which made them perfect targets for a certain criminal enterprise. We also believe that had the ground rules been fair, many of the companies could have survived and thousands upon thousands of investors would not have fallen victim to substantial losses. Had many of these companies been allowed to function without the hazards of naked short selling and hatchet job news articles, they may have overcome the short comings faced by many start up companies. Had there have been more oversight by regulators and more restrictions on illegal trading and manipulation, many investors today would be free from the losses that they have encountered. There may have been a more level playing field if government officials had not been paid for confidential information by short sellers ( see reference articles listed below in this web site), and if certain members of the media had not been paid members of the criminal enterprise( listed later on in this site are certain allegations made against certain members of the media by corporate officials).

The media can have a direct influence on the manipulation of publicly traded securities, especially if the media source is a noted financial news source. One negative article can have a devastating effect on the trading price of a public company. Take a look at WADE, EDSN, ALU, ECNC, SEVU, CIO, ZERO, BIOP, ANTS, VLPI, and see how they were attacked by negative news articles published by certain financial news media sources. See what happened to their trading within 24 hours of the negative news articles being published about them. Some of the companies survived and others have gone out of business, or have been targeted by class action lawsuits. It is no coincidence that these companies were publicly targeted by short sellers and at the time they were targeted as a short call, certain news journalists wrote negative articles about the companies, driving down the price of the publicly traded security. Waiting in the wings were a certain group of law firms preparing to file class action law suits. When "coincidences" such as that occur, we call it MANIPULATION, and part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.

Two years ago, this type of activity by noted short sellers and the media, was open and notorious. Today the activities are more covert and not as obvious, but they still exist. Finally after the filing of numerous complaints, the FBI and the SEC, have taken notice of this ongoing pattern of criminal activity. Certain individuals have been indicted including noted short sellers and both current and former government agents (see articles listed below). Certain media journalists have now come under scrutiny and are being closely monitored by both private and governmental agencies.

We have taken it upon ourselves to write this series of articles expressing our views and opinions and as such have been victimized by intimidation and threats from certain participants in the criminal enterprise and their attornies. Irregardless of these attempts of intimidation, we will continue to report on what we believe to be criminal activity directed at publicly traded companies and innocent investors. We will stand up for the true victims.

As a friend once stated, "the wheels of justice turn slowly, but they do turn". It does not matter who you are, or even if your boss is the mayor of a major U.S. city! We will not be intimidated!



The above report was prepared and published by Asiavest-China and translated to English from the original Chinese report.
All rights reserved. Any copying, distribution, or other use, must be with the written approval of Asiavest-China.

angelfire.com