SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neeka who wrote (6374)7/28/2003 5:40:23 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12229
 
Yeah, well, their days are numbered. Notice how they are so scared they stay a longggggggg way away.

They might be big and there might be a lot of them, but the bigger they are, the harder they fall. That's event horizon and singularity physics in lay terms [which is all I know].

They might be big, but they aren't very bright; in an intelligence sense - unless they are nodes of a quantum computing intergalactic network and that brightness is encoded data of some currently indecipherable type. In which case we could have trouble taking over.

But if not, when we start tipping them into a quantum tunnel they'll soon be in trouble.

I just need to get those gravitons spinning backwards and I'll have them nailed.

Mqurice



To: Neeka who wrote (6374)7/29/2003 8:25:12 AM
From: jackmore  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12229
 
So, is it reasonable to assume that the odds of life on this little blue ball being the only life in the universe are about 70 sextillion to one?

Or that the odds against CDMA existing anywhere else are even greater? Is this further proof that Maurice is right, Qualcomm has charged way too little for its patents?!!!