Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NickSE who wrote (108598)	7/28/2003 9:55:36 PM
From: NickSE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

U.S. Adopts Aggressive Tactics on Iraqi Fighters Intensified Offensive Leads To Detentions, Intelligence washingtonpost.com .....Three major U.S. operations unfolded over the past two months. In the first one in June, Peninsula Strike, U.S. commanders learned that much of the opposition was coming from Baath Party operatives and their allies in the old Iraqi intelligence services. Desert Scorpion, aimed at cutting off escape routes for fugitive Iraqi leaders, came in late June. It began with 56 simultaneous large-scale raids across central Iraq and brought in a hoard of intelligence. Among those netted was Abid Hamid Mahmud, Hussein's trusted aide. "That was a big event," recalled a senior Army official. "He has revealed a lot. He knew where all the safe houses and ratlines were." Ratlines is an Army term for escape routes. The third major operation, dubbed Soda Mountain, was the first expressly preemptive effort. Concerned about the threat of an offensive tied to July 17, the 35th anniversary of the day Hussein's Baath Party took power, U.S. troops rounded up 600 party operatives. "We were aggressive and out there, looking to preclude attacks," the official said. For example, for six days leading up to the holiday, every car leaving Bayji -- a town of 30,000 sitting astride Iraq's major north-south highway -- was stopped at a checkpoint, and many were searched.....

To: NickSE who wrote (108598)	7/28/2003 10:10:46 PM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

I remember saying once, a long time ago, that once American troops finish attacking and become an occupation force, they will be very vulnerable to terrorist attacks. I also remember saying that the attackers don't have to drive the Americans out. They have to do two things: keep the security situation bad enough to prevent reconstruction work, which needs extensive involvement from civilian contractors, from proceeding, and force the US troops into aggressive and generic responses. Right now, I'd say they are succeeding. Reconstruction is clearly lagging. One TV picture of a bunch of huge American soldiers slamming one Iraqi to the ground does us more harm than a hundred RPG rounds, and the sweep-searches are just what the terrorists want us to do. I see pictures of Americans apparently firing at crowds on Brit TV; I know they aren't the whole story, but a lot of the people watching won't make that distinction. If we let ourselves get forced into that kind of thing, we are going to lose this. I wish we could get some presence from some other nationality in there to divert some of the heat, but we've burned a lot of those bridges. If things continue as they are, I see popular support for the US in Iraq, which I think is still pretty high, eroding. That's not good; it means that all the enemy has to do is keep doing what he's doing. We are the ones that need to adapt, and if we don't we could lose control of this. We haven't, yet. But we could. The scenario that scares me is the possibility of a kid getting killed, or something like that, then you get 10,000 pissed off people at the funeral, contact with US troops, then something gets provoked and a bunch of people get killed. Our enemies will try to make this happen; it's a tactic they know well, and they will be more than happy to sacrifice their own people, if they can get us to shoot them in public. Our people have to resist provocation in any public situation, at all costs, and that is damned hard to do when your opponent has the initiative and wants to provoke. If we let ourselves get baited into behaving like the Israelis, we are in deep shit. We'll see.