SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin Rose who wrote (435056)7/29/2003 12:49:12 AM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
You are claiming the the Niger intelligence was "faulty". The British stand by it. Do I prefer their considered opinion to your left-wing propaganda duped one?

What a DUMB question...



To: Kevin Rose who wrote (435056)7/29/2003 11:30:16 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
CY, replied and it was a very very good reply. But you see your stupidity of logic, thinking, reasoning ability is revealed by your concluding any preferred is implied by any argument I have made. I make what are obvious interpretations of the way you present information and opinion.

In any case of factual judgement there are varying degrees of positives and negatives. Anyone having read any of the past histories of actual cases of spies and spying know that it's usually about seeing connections and being in the right place or having contact with the right person for every case. Failing to confirm something also results from not having the right person in the right place. There is also counterintel. In WWII the Germans were fed thousands of pieces of bogus intel that fooled them into not believing D-Day was the real deal. Your posts show you are completely ignorant of such things or you simply have no brain power to understand their meaning. That assuming one gives you the benefit of the doubt that you are honest.

Your question shows you are a total ignoramus about the system and process of spycraft. Your past posts and this also show you are a total ignoramus about the vetting process of information in a speech.

The fact that in the face of having clear logical explanations that demonstrate you total state of ignoramus on so much and your never ending posting showing you have no ability whatsoever to learn is what I call the demonstration of abject ignorance that leads to a certain conclusion of your abject stupidity.

You hate PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH and using stupidity in thinking that is ignorant of any objective rational logic you make proffers and rhetorical questions that demonstrate the 99.99999% certainty of your stupidity and hate.

The only logical redemption from stupidity determination is that you are lying. But my best guess is you are not really lying which make your posts such incredible slapstick.

It's also called being dumber that dirt, or a bag of hammers.

I give PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH the same benefit of the doubt that I give you. Under forensic analysis PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH shows the genius of leadership and you show what I am not allowed to say.... LOL....

I have done alls kinds of systems analysis including covert intelligience and counter intelligence.