Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (84982)	7/29/2003 10:50:53 AM
From: scion	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

Also, why would a site who has an invasion of privacy clause in their Terms of Use as well as a repeated documented view about posting personal information allow such a thing to happen to a private individual with known information about Elgindy. I suspect if personal information was posted of someone defending Elgindy that the sites in question would delete it PDQ. Methinks the lady in question doth protest too much, even for a drama queen...I hope she read that section she quoted very thoroughly. TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 73 > Sec. 1512. Prev \| Next Sec. 1512. - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant By: ViperChick 29 Jul 2003, 10:33 AM EDT Msg. 9918 of 9918 (This msg. is a reply to 9917 by OBSERVER22.) Jump to msg. # www4.law.cornell.edu In addition, those that could be called as a witness because of their knowledge fall into that category. The FBI needs to investigate this whole matter including any part Elgindy or those associated with him played in the intimidation of current or potential federal witnesses. The personal emails and private messages of the individuals in question need to be investigated. The fact that Swash is likely not you is irrelevant because Scion and crew claimed that it was you. So, anything they did to Swash was in effect being done to you. Also, why would a site who has an invasion of privacy clause in their Terms of Use as well as a repeated documented view about posting personal information allow such a thing to happen to a private individual with known information about Elgindy. I suspect if personal information was posted of someone defending Elgindy that the sites in question would delete it PDQ. There was NO legitimate reason to post ANY information identifying me except to harass, intimidate, and put my safety and that of my family at risk. Please pass this post on to the appropriate people. ragingbull.lycos.com