Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scion who wrote (84991)	7/29/2003 3:29:58 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Ridiculous. I believe anyone that is intentionally outed by members of a criminal enterprise (especially if they are witnesses or complaintants), should be concerned for their safety and the FBI should take notice! JMHO Anyone who posts on the message boards might be "outed" at any time, especially if he or she is a professional investigator who works for the management of otcbb companies. In my view, such people should make Rule 17b disclosure routinely. If they don't want to do that, and fear being "outed", then they simply shouldn't post. As for Chalem and Lehman, their murders have never been solved. Elgindy knew Chalem some years earlier, but there's never been any suggestion by the officials investigating the case that the two men's deaths had to do with anything Tony was involved in. And I think it's more than a stretch to live in fear of message board vengeance simply because people get murdered. Unfortunately, people get murdered all the time. Recently a number of folks in the finance biz went on trial in Vancouver for a series of contract murders. Are they somehow "related" to "this group" as well? I don't think so. Hey, I put my name out there, and so did Jeff, when we were trying to get to the bottom of the Chalem-Lehman murders. As Observer notes, we were all over the press. Did anyone threaten to kill us? Of course not. Moreover, I find it deeply ironic that it's Observer himself who keeps claiming that he's an Important Federal Witness. He didn't need to do that. If he hadn't, we wouldn't have known, now would we?