Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (172780)	7/29/2003 1:29:34 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1580019

Ted, Even if Dr. Kay comes up with massive WMD programs, it will mean little to me. It should, given that such a find would prove that your preferred solution, inspections, wasn't working. Tenchusatsu

To: tejek who wrote (172780)	7/29/2003 7:28:14 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Respond to of 1580019

tejek, re:you can not provide me with a factual answer to explain your position so you try and make me wrong. It's based on evidence you prefer to ignore, namely years of declarations, usage of WMD and inspections that found WMD in Iraq prior to 1998. Furthermore, you take it at face value that Saddam disarmed himself after he kicked out the inspectors that you claim were doing such a wonderful job - I can't prove anything new until they report their findings from Iraq. Why are you in such a rush to draw conclusions? So yes, I believe you are either taking Saddam's side or far too naive or worse motivated solely on partisan politics. re:Even if Dr. Kay comes up with massive WMD programs, it will mean little to me. So no evidence is good enough for you, why do I need to provide you with any proof again? You actually think you're being reasonable? What a farce you are, purely driven by your politics or hate for our President. You're not even remotely interested in buried devices in yards and can't seem to or refuse to connect the dots. For someone who claims to be open minded you sure seem narrow - the only evidence you'll accept is a nuclear device that's finished and ready to use. No one claimed they were that far, but that they had restarted their program - which will be a pile of documents.