SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neeka who wrote (108839)7/30/2003 8:28:03 AM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
It is hard to take you seriously when you ask that it be proven that Saddam was not seeking yellowcake.



To: Neeka who wrote (108839)7/30/2003 2:24:57 PM
From: Noel de Leon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"Bush and Iraq: Follow the Yellow Cake Road
Tony Karon's Web Log: The question is no longer whether the President uttered a falsehood in his indictment of Iraq; it's at what point the Administration learned the claim of uranium purchases from Niger was false

Is a fib really a fib if the teller is unaware that he is uttering an untruth? That question appears to be the basis of the White House defense, having now admitted a falsehood in President Bush's claim, in his State of the Union address, that Iraq had tried to buy uranium in Africa. But that defense is under mounting pressure from a variety of sources claiming that the White House could not have been unaware that the claim was false, because it had been checked out — and debunked — by U.S. intelligence a year before the President repeated it.

So, the White House is not contesting the fact that the President made a false claim — merely whether he, or those who prepared his speech, knew at the time that it was false. And holding the line forces White House press secretary Ari Fleischer into a rhetorical dance that can only be called Clintonesque: conceding on the one hand that the claim made by the President was based on forged evidence that Iraq had tried to buy "yellow cake" refined uranium from Niger, but at the same time maintaining that "I see nothing that goes broader that would indicate that there was no basis to the President's broader statement." "

time.com



To: Neeka who wrote (108839)7/30/2003 2:34:21 PM
From: Noel de Leon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"Just as it is the American people that would like the left to prove that SH/Iraq *wasn't* seeking yellow cake from Niger. As well as supporting the war in Iraq."

"The American people would like...." Among all 280 million of them are there no leftists?
Get real.
"As well as supporting the war in Iraq." Do all American "leftists" refuse to support Bush II war #1?
Get a grip. Of course there are "leftists" who support the war.