Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (172873)	7/30/2003 4:53:24 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571405

Ten, re: If you think that's too petty a reason for Clinton to go to war, consider this: None of his military actions during those two years were tough or costly decisions to make. A cruise missile attack on Sudan, a bombing campaign on Iraqi targets that has no anti-air defenses, and a Kosovo conflict that Europe wanted America's help in anyway. Nope, you are right. We lost very few lives in those wars, and they didn't leave continuing payments of $4B per month. And besides, it was Clinton, so it must have been politically motivated. re: Compare that with the enormous consequences over Bush's decision to invade Iraq, and you'll see the method behind my so-called madness. I see madness, not much method. John

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (172873)	7/30/2003 6:58:23 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1571405

You notice how the vast majority of his military actions occurred in 1998 and 1999, the years of the scandal. Coincidence? Yeah! That sly devil........he got Kosovo to blow up and Saddam to kick out the weapons inspectors so he could cover up that cigar thingy with Monica. Now why didn't I see that before? ted