Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (109146)	7/31/2003 3:47:02 PM
From: GST	Respond to of 281500

What was I wrong about?

To: michael97123 who wrote (109146)	7/31/2003 8:42:36 PM
From: KyrosL	Respond to of 281500

Mike, I always wondered what was so important about the multilateral talks, especially when the rest of the talkers are less hostile to the NK than the US and some are almost friends of them. I think that if Bush wanted bilateral talks, the NK would have insisted on multilateral ones. I suspect the format dispute was nothing but a delaying tactic by NK to wear down the US -- perhaps even to give them time to assemble some nukes. Now that we think they retreated, I am afraid their next move will be an unexpected counterpunch, like a nuclear test or something. Hope I am wrong. Kyros