Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (23973)	8/1/2003 2:05:51 AM
From: Proud Deplorable	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

No Lazarus I won't. You quote CNN ? HA HA HA The CNN video and story are pure fabrications. There was no plane. Not one verifiable piece of the plane was found. But the reporter who did NOT see it said this "something" came in so low that it snapped off a car antenna ! LOLOLOLOL I can't believe they can be so stupid or think the public is so gullible. The CNN report said that the plane disintegrated and the heat from the explosion vaporized everything or some such statement. Seems that the computer monitor on the desk on the top floor which is made out of plastic was not melted but all of the evidence of the plane is LOL. Another thing, this item that they claim is the plane over the control box is WAY too small to have been a jetliner. Pictures dont lie. If it were a jetliner the building on both sides of the gapeing hole would have been damaged and fuel spilled out on them and ignited also. This didn't happen because it was not a plane. This was either a ground launched missle of some kind or launched from an airplane ( doubtful ) but more likely launched from close distance at a low level. If it were a jetliner far more damage would have been done. The reporter didn't see it. He said he was at the Pentagon but first heard about it from, who else ? CNN Sorry, but you have to do better than present nonsense from CNN because they have no credibility. CNN is a lie a minute. Look again at the right wing republican web site. Here is the truth: thepowerhour.com What happened to the flight itself ? They crashed it in Ohio. Remember that there were two versions of the official flight path of same flight and they don't jive. The reason for this is because they wer emade up. In my opinion, there was good reason to hit certain offices of the Pentagon for they were probably where the planning for this operation took place and now, of course they aren't talking LOL. Likely the people at the top planned on taking out their own comrades so as to reduce the number of witnesses that would later come forward. A well placed missle is a powerful deterrant in a cover up as most of the important evidence re WTC operations was probably destroyed. This last bit is just conjecture on my part but you will have to do far far better than come up with a doctored broadcast from the enemy (CNN) with photos of a tiny speck of something which is nowhere the size of a passenger jet. If the "plane" didn't leave skid marks on the ground yet the tail is 44 feet tall then why is the roof undamaged (save for its collapse) ? thepowerhour.com Oh yes..the monitor on the top floor which survived the extreme heat ? "To make the next and possibly the most important point of this report, let us recall the other events that happened earlier that day. At 8:45 AM EST, American flight #11 slammed into the North Tower at the World Trade Center. The resulting fireball was so huge and so hot, that as reported, it melted and fatigued the supporting steel girders to the point that the building collapsed. At 9:03 AM EST, United flight #175 slammed into the South Tower at the World Trade Center. The resulting fireball was so huge and so hot, that as reported, it melted and fatigued the supporting steel girders to the point that the building collapsed. At 9:40 AM, EST, American flight #77 reportedly slammed into the Pentagon. All three of these planes had embarked on a trans-continental flight and carried approximately 8,600 remaining gallons of fuel at the time of their respective impacts. The first two crashes caused intense fires hot enough to melt steel. Now look very closely at photo #6. Notice the left side of the hole and note that the walls of the interior are not only unblemished, but show no signs of soot, smoke or heat damage. On the upper floor, to the left of one of the support columns, one can plainly see a green file cabinet with a computer monitor or TV on top of it. Two floors below one can plainly see a wooden stool with an open book on top of it. Are we to believe that a plane with 8,600 gallons of fuel would not generate a fireball and enough heat to singe the pages of an open book only feet away? or to melt the plastic case of a monitor? " thepowerhour.com Again,......where's the plane ? It disintegrated completely but left the walls of the building uncharred and didn't melt a compueter monitor's case ? C'mon